Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Standing waves can cause errors during in-the-ear calibration of sound pressure level (SPL), affecting both stimulus magnitude and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level. Sound intensity level (SIL) and forward pressure level (FPL) are two measurements theoretically unaffected by standing waves. SPL, SIL, and FPL in situ calibrations were compared by determining sensitivity of DPOAE level to probe-insertion depth (deep and "shallow") for a range of stimulus frequencies (1-8 kHz) and levels (20-60 dB). Probe-insertion depth was manipulated with the intent to shift the frequencies with standing-wave minima at the emission probe, introducing variability during SPL calibration. The absolute difference in DPOAE level between insertions was evaluated after correcting for an incidental change caused by the effect of ear-canal impedance on the emission traveling from the cochlea. A three-way analysis of variance found significant main effects for stimulus level, stimulus frequency, and calibration method, as well as significant interactions involving calibration method. All calibration methods exhibited changes in DPOAE level due to the insertion depth, especially above 4 kHz. However, SPL demonstrated the greatest changes across all stimulus levels for frequencies above 2 kHz, suggesting that SIL and FPL provide more consistent measurements of DPOAEs for frequencies susceptible to standing-wave calibration errors.

[1]  D D Dirks,et al.  Acoustics of ear canal measurement of eardrum SPL in simulators. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M P Gorga,et al.  Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J H Siegel,et al.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W M Rabinowitz,et al.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Neely,et al.  Towards understanding the limits of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Gerald R. Popelka,et al.  Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary-tone level in humans , 1993, Hearing Research.

[10]  D D Dirks,et al.  Basic Acoustic Considerations of Ear Canal: Probe Measurements , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[11]  A. Møller Improved Technique for Detailed Measurements of the Middle Ear Impedance , 1960 .

[12]  S. Neely,et al.  From Laboratory to Clinic: A Large Scale Study of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears with Normal Hearing and Ears with Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[13]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. D. Wn•x ON MINIMUM AUDIBLE SOUND FIELDS* , 2004 .

[15]  J. H. Siegel,et al.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies , 1994, Hearing Research.

[16]  J H Siegel Cross‐Talk in Otoacoustic Emission Probes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[17]  L. Sheppard,et al.  Developing standards for distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  M C Killion,et al.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"? , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  S. Neely,et al.  A Validation and Potential Clinical Application of Multivariate Analyses of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Data , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[23]  H. Hudde,et al.  Methods for estimating the sound pressure at the eardrum. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  D H Keefe,et al.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. R. Stinson,et al.  The spatial distribution of sound pressure within scaled replicas of the human ear canal. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[28]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  The Effectiveness of External and Middle Ears in Coupling Acoustic Power into the Cochlea , 1986 .

[29]  Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  D. H. Keefe Acoustical wave propagation in cylindrical ducts: Transmission line parameter approximations for isothermal and nonisothermal boundary conditions , 1984 .

[31]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[32]  Tiffany A Johnson,et al.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R. Kalluri,et al.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. Siegel,et al.  Ear‐canal standing waves and high‐frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes , 1994 .

[35]  C D Geisler,et al.  Estimation of eardrum acoustic pressure and of ear canal length from remote points in the canal. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  R. Dadson,et al.  A Determination of the Normal Threshold of Hearing and its Relation to the Standardization of Audiometers , 1952, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[37]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  Threshold of Hearing and Equal‐Loudness Relations for Pure Tones, and the Loudness Function , 1957 .

[38]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Measurement of Eardrum Acoustic Impedance , 1986 .