Influence of UI Complexity and Positioning on User Experience During VR Exergames

In past years, as virtual reality (VR) technology is extensively developing, more and more people are using it in different fields. One of the fast developing fields in VR are exergames, a combination of physical exercise and game. With a goal to engage people in physical activity, VR exergames should look and feel good for users. Therefore, user interface (UI) in VR is important and has to be built in a way to enhance user experience. In this paper, ergometer is used together with VR rowing environment as VR exergame for a study aiming to explore possibilities of UI in VR. Accordingly, different metrics commonly used to quantify rowing action (e.g, speed and distance) were visualized. The visualizations that were created had different positioning (closer or further away from the player) and different level of complexity (more or less metrics shown as only numbers or in a gamified design). Participants (N = 27) during experiment for this study rowed four times in different conditions depending were metrics of the game were shown: 1) as a cockpit at the front of the rowing e.g, with gamified visualization of metrics; 2) as a coach boat that follows the player with gamified visualization of metrics on a screen; 3) as a cockpit at the front of the rowing e.g, with digital visualization of metrics; 4) as a coach boat that follows the player with digital visualization of metrics on a screen. Results show that level of UI complexity has a significant influence on readability, while positioning of UI elements significantly influences users’ perception of support from system. Furthermore, participants preferred the opposite level of complexity depending on the position where metrics were shown.

[1]  Achintya K. Bhowmik Recent Developments in Virtual-Reality and Augmented-Reality Technologies , 2017 .

[2]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. , 1997 .

[3]  Mehdi Bennis,et al.  Toward Interconnected Virtual Reality: Opportunities, Challenges, and Enablers , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  W. Peng,et al.  Need Satisfaction Supportive Game Features as Motivational Determinants: An Experimental Study of a Self-Determination Theory Guided Exergame , 2012 .

[5]  Kristine Jørgensen,et al.  Do Players Prefer Integrated User Interfaces? A Qualitative Study of Game UI Design Issues , 2011 .

[6]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Long and short measures of flow: the construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. , 2008, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[7]  Michael Zyda,et al.  From visual simulation to virtual reality to games , 2005, Computer.

[8]  H. Marsh,et al.  Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale , 1996 .

[9]  Mike Alger,et al.  Visual Design Methods for Virtual Reality , 2015 .

[10]  I. Bogost The Rhetoric of Exergaming , 2005 .

[11]  Mike Lambert,et al.  PaperDude: a virtual reality cycling exergame , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Judy Kay,et al.  Designing a Personalized VR Exergame , 2017, UMAP.

[13]  Cyriel Diels,et al.  Self-driving carsickness. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Judy Kay,et al.  VRun: running-in-place virtual reality exergame , 2016, OZCHI.

[15]  Philip Hingston,et al.  Considerations for the design of exergames , 2007, GRAPHITE '07.

[16]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire , 2008, USAB.

[17]  Sherrilene Classen,et al.  Driving simulator sickness: an evidence-based review of the literature. , 2011, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[18]  Christof Lutteroth,et al.  Challenges in Virtual Reality Exergame Design , 2015, AUIC.

[19]  Niklas Elmqvist,et al.  Toward Visualization for Games: Theory, Design Space, and Patterns , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Eugene Nalivaiko,et al.  Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness , 2017, PloS one.