Distraction Osteogenesis in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction Applications: Feasibility Study of Design and Development of an Automatic Continuous Distractor

Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) is one of novel techniques widely used in bone Reconstruction Applications (RA). Recently, DO method has got an important role in oral and maxillofacial RA; by using DO bone defects and skeletal deformities in different cranio-maxillofacial areas can be reconstructed, with better results and reduced effects in comparison to conventional methods. In DO by using a tension-stress principle, mechanical stimulations induce bone generation and biological responses of the tissue. A DO procedure starts with bone osteotomy and implementation of distractor, before proceeding with distraction, there is a latency period which allows the callus to form initially. In the distraction phase, the generated external force goes through the moving bone segment and gradually distract the callus. After distraction phase, there is a consolidation phase and then the device is removed. Most of current DO methods are applied by manual devices; low accuracy and reliability, discontinuous force, manually-operated, and associated problems for patient are major disadvantages of manual devices. Recent studies have revealed using an automatic continuous distractor could significantly improve the DO results while decreasing the existing problems. The purpose of this study is to design and simulate a novel automatic continuous distractor to be used in DO applications. The device contains mini stepper motor and gear-box, controller, mechatronic system, LCD, and keypad. Design’s specification and simulations results show this device has the capability to generate a continuous distraction force for a successful automatic DO.

[1]  Omid Ghahraei,et al.  Design and Development of a Novel CNC Controller for Improving Machining Speed , 2016 .

[2]  M. Hu,et al.  Transport Distraction Osteogenesis Using Nitinol Spring: An Exploration in Canine Mandible , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  J. Matinlinna,et al.  The Biomechanical Properties of Human Craniofacial Sutures and Relevant Variables in Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis: A Critical Review. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[4]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  V. Everts,et al.  Bone Regeneration during Distraction Osteogenesis . A review , 2007 .

[6]  Brian A. Murphy,et al.  Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  Jae-Gi Lee,et al.  A Piezoelectric Motor-Based Microactuator-Generated Distractor for Continuous Jaw Bone Distraction , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis using superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  J. Barbenel,et al.  Mandibular elongation by automatic distraction osteogenesis: the first application in humans. , 2005, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  Ann Marie Sastry,et al.  An Implantable Battery System for a Continuous Automatic Distraction Device for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis , 2010 .

[11]  F W Neukam,et al.  Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration. , 2005, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Range of curvilinear distraction devices required for treatment of mandibular deformities. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Rat Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Part I. Histologic and Radiographic Analysis , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Membranous Bone Lengthening: A Serial Histological Study , 1992, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  John C Magill,et al.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  L. Cheung,et al.  Angiogenesis is enhanced by continuous traction in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis. , 2009, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[18]  John C Magill,et al.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis. , 2014, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[19]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Bone Lengthening in the Craniofacial Skeleton , 1989, Annals of plastic surgery.

[20]  J. Wiltfang,et al.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[21]  E. Browne,et al.  MANDIBULAR LENGTHENING BY GRADUAL DISTRACTION: Preliminary Report , 1973, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  F. Rimell,et al.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a neonate. , 1999, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[23]  柑本 晴夫 Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction , 1988 .

[24]  A. Ayoub,et al.  A new device for microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[25]  L. Claes,et al.  Novel systems for the application of isolated tensile, compressive, and shearing stimulation of distraction callus tissue , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  G. Kumar,et al.  The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues: Part II. The Influence of the Rate and Frequency of Distraction , 2014 .

[27]  H. Kumamoto,et al.  Timed-release system for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using NiTi mesh and absorbable material in the rabbit calvaria. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[28]  F. Neukam,et al.  Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[29]  E. Wolvius,et al.  Continuous versus discontinuous distraction: evaluation of bone regenerate following various rhythms of distraction. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[30]  T. Rahman,et al.  Development of a Force-Driven Distractor for Distraction Osteogenesis , 2011 .

[31]  John C Magill,et al.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. , 2009, Journal of medical devices.

[32]  N. Yin,et al.  Midface Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Modified External Device With Elastic Distraction for Crouzon Syndrome , 2017, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[33]  Nathan B. Crane,et al.  Design and Feasibility Testing of a Novel Device for Automatic Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible , 2004 .

[34]  E. Chao,et al.  Callus stimulation in distraction osteogenesis. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[35]  G. Kumar,et al.  The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues Part I. The Influence of Stability of Fixation and Soft-Tissue Preservation , 2014 .

[36]  E Unger,et al.  Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep. , 1999, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[37]  J. Prévot,et al.  Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[38]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[39]  M. C. M. Wong,et al.  High-rhythm automatic driver for bone traction: an experimental study in rabbits. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[40]  D. B. Tuinzing,et al.  Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[41]  G. Artaş,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Local and Systemic Zoledronic Acid Application on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis , 2017, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[42]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: II. Molecular analysis of transforming growth factor beta-1 and osteocalcin gene expression. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[43]  Fatih Zor,et al.  Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis With Newly Designed Electromechanical Distractor , 2014, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[44]  M. Hu,et al.  Rapid Lengthening of Rabbit Mandibular Ramus by Using Nitinol Spring: A Preliminary Study , 2004, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[45]  Omid Ghahraei,et al.  Design and Development of a Novel Multi-Axis Automatic Controller for Improving Accuracy in CNC Applications , 2017 .