A method for assessing ecological values to reconcile multiple land use needs

We present a new method for ecologically sustainable land use planning within multiple land use schemes. Our aims were (1) to develop a method that can be used to locate important areas based on their ecological values; (2) to evaluate the quality, quantity, availability, and usability of existing ecological data sets; and (3) to demonstrate the use of the method in Eastern Finland, where there are requirements for the simultaneous development of nature conservation, tourism, and recreation. We compiled all available ecological data sets from the study area, complemented the missing data using habitat suitability modeling, calculated the total ecological score (TES) for each 1 ha grid cell in the study area, and finally, demonstrated the use of TES in assessing the success of nature conservation in covering ecologically valuable areas and locating ecologically sustainable areas for tourism and recreational infrastructure. The method operated quite well at the level required for regional and local scale planning. The quality, quantity, availability, and usability of existing data sets were generally high, and they could be further complemented by modeling. There are still constraints that limit the use of the method in practical land use planning. However, as increasing data become available and open access, and modeling tools improve, the usability and applicability of the method will increase.

[1]  David N. Cole,et al.  Threats to Wilderness Ecosystems: Impacts and Research Needs , 1996 .

[2]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Jane Elith,et al.  Error and uncertainty in habitat models , 2006 .

[4]  A. Tolvanen,et al.  Ecological Impacts of Revegetation and Management Practices of Ski Slopes in Northern Finland , 2009, Environmental management.

[5]  A. Laine,et al.  Restoration of managed pine fens: effect on hydrology and vegetation , 2011 .

[6]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[7]  J. Saarinen.  The Regional Economics of Tourism in Northern Finland: The Socio-economic Implications of Recent Tourism Development and Future Possibilities for Regional Development , 2003 .

[8]  C. Pickering,et al.  Tourism and recreation: a common threat to IUCN red-listed vascular plants in Europe , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[9]  Anne Tolvanen,et al.  Tourism, biodiversity and protected areas--Review from northern Fennoscandia. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation , 2015 .

[11]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas , 2015, PLoS biology.

[12]  Teijo Rytteri,et al.  The art of neoliberalizing park management: commodification, politics and hotel construction in pallasyllästunturi national park, finland , 2012 .

[13]  A. Manica,et al.  A Global Perspective on Trends in Nature-Based Tourism , 2009, PLoS biology.

[14]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Free Access to Landsat Imagery , 2008, Science.

[15]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity conservation planning tools , 2006 .

[16]  S. Polasky,et al.  CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES , 2005 .

[17]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[18]  R. G. Wright,et al.  NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY? , 2001 .

[19]  S. Wipf,et al.  Effects of ski piste preparation on alpine vegetation , 2005 .

[20]  R. Väisänen,et al.  Estimating relative densities of breeding birds by the line transect method , 1975 .

[21]  Greg Stuart-Hill,et al.  Effect of biodiversity on economic benefits from communal lands in Namibia , 2011 .

[22]  Pierfrancesca Rossi,et al.  Coupling indicators of ecological value and ecological sensitivity with indicators of demographic pressure in the demarcation of new areas to be protected: The case of the Oltrepò Pavese and the Ligurian-Emilian Apennine area (Italy) , 2008 .

[23]  C. Tovar,et al.  Determining the ecological value of landscapes beyond protected areas , 2012 .

[24]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  The use of detailed biotope data for linking biodiversity with ecosystem services in Finland , 2012 .

[25]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Use of Inverse Spatial Conservation Prioritization to Avoid Biological Diversity Loss Outside Protected Areas , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Miguel B. Araújo,et al.  Systematic Conservation Planning Comes of Age , 2009 .

[27]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  Laurence Smith,et al.  The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Petteri VihervaaraLaura.  How to integrate remotely sensed data and biodiversity for ecosystem assessments at landscape scale , 2015 .

[30]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .