Type a uncertainty in jitter measurements in communication networks

Reliable quality of service measurements are crucial issues to monitor and evaluate the performance of computer and communication networks. To these aims, depending on the applications, several figures of merit have to be measured. They mainly concern with: throughput, available bandwidth, packet jitter, one way delay, round trip delay, and packet loss. To estimate these quantities two general classes of measurement systems (also known as “protocol analyzers”) can be considered: Special Purpose Architecture based Protocol Analyzer (SPAPA) and General Purpose Architecture based Protocol Analyzer (GPAPA). Both measurement solutions can be thought as composed by a reference data traffic generator and one or more measurement nodes. All these components are constituted by hardware and software sections which cooperate to achieve the measurement results. Focusing the attention on the uncertainty involved in the QoS indexes measurement, no information is provided by the manufactures for both SPAPA and GPAPA. In addition, the analysis of the literature in the field of computer networks testing, has highlighted that this important aspect is not adequately dealt with or that methodological studies are not yet available. This paper proposes a suitable approach to evaluate the type A measurement uncertainty of SPAPA and GPAPA systems. A general model to study the effect of the involved quantities of influence is presented and a method to quantify their effects is provided. The experimental results show the suitability and the effectiveness of the proposal.

[1]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Analysis and experimentation of Internet Traffic Generator , 2003 .

[2]  D. Capriglione,et al.  An efficient experimental approach for the uncertainty estimation of QoS parameters in communication networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[3]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  A Distributed Multiplatform Architecture For Traffic Generation , 2004 .

[4]  Carmine Landi,et al.  Uncertainty and reproducibility in measuring the data acquisition system immunity to conducted disturbances , 2009 .

[5]  L. Angrisani,et al.  Testing communication and computer networks: an overview , 2008, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[6]  Giorgio Ventre,et al.  Measurement of processing and queuing delays introduced by an open-source router in a single-hop network , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  G. Giorgi,et al.  Detection of Anomalous Behaviors in Networks From Traffic Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  G. Betta,et al.  Experimental Performance Analysis of Power Line Telecommunication Modem for Indoor Applications , 2007, 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007.

[9]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  A measurement-driven approach to assess power line telecommunication (PLT) network quality of service (QoS) performance parameters , 2009 .

[10]  Luigino Benetazzo,et al.  On the Analysis of Communication and Computer Networks by Traffic Flow Measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Othmar Kyas Network Troubleshooting , 2001 .

[12]  G. Ventre,et al.  On the Statistics of QoS Parameters over Heterogeneous Networks , 2006 .

[13]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  Experimental Study of Coexistence Issues Between IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.