Phonotactic Knowledge and Lexical-Semantic Processing in One-year-olds: Brain Responses to Words and Nonsense Words in Picture Contexts

During their first year of life, infants not only acquire probabilistic knowledge about the phonetic, prosodic, and phonotactic organization of their native language, but also begin to establish first lexical-semantic representations. The present study investigated the sensitivity to phonotactic regularities and its impact on semantic processing in 1-year-olds. We applied the method of event-related brain potentials to 12-and 19-month-old children and to an adult control group. While looking at pictures of known objects, subjects listened to spoken nonsense words that were phonotactically legal (pseudowords) or had phonotactically illegal word onsets (nonwords), or to real words that were either congruous or incongruous to the picture contents. In 19-month-olds and in adults, incongruous words and pseudowords, but not non-words, elicited an N400 known to reflect mechanisms of semantic integration. For congruous words, the N400 was attenuated by semantic priming. In contrast, 12-month-olds did not show an N400 difference, neither between pseudo-and nonwords nor between incongruous and congruous words. Both 1-year-old groups and adults additionally displayed a lexical priming effect for congruous words, that is, a negativity starting around 100 msec after words onset. One-year-olds, moreover, displayed a phonotactic familiarity effect, that is, a widely distributed negativity starting around 250 msec in 19-month-olds but occurring later in 12-month-olds. The results imply that both lexical priming and phonotactic familiarity already affect the processing of acoustic stimuli in children at 12 months of age. In 19-month-olds, adult-like mechanisms of semantic integration are present in response to phonotactically legal, but not to phonotactically illegal, nonsense words, indicating that children at this age treat pseudo-words, but not nonwords, as potential word candidates.

[1]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Manuela Friedrich,et al.  Early N400 development and later language acquisition. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Development patterns of brain activity reflecting semantic and syntactic processes , 2001 .

[4]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[5]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain Signatures of Syntactic and Semantic Processes during Children's Language Development , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-Language Speech Perception : Initial Capabilities and Developmental Change , 2001 .

[9]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  M. Rugg,et al.  Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Event related brain potentials to semantically incongruent words in children of different ages. , 1997, Archives of medical research.

[12]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[13]  P. Jusczyk The discovery of spoken language , 1997 .

[14]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Language Experience and the Organization of Brain Activity to Phonetically Similar Words: ERP Evidence from 14- and 20-Month-Olds , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  The Neural Basis of Language Development and Its Impairment , 2006, Neuron.

[16]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  N400-like Semantic Incongruity Effect in 19-Month-Olds: Processing Known Words in Picture Contexts , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[19]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition , 1987, Brain and Language.

[20]  D. Molfese,et al.  Known versus unknown word discriminations in 12‐month‐old human infants: Electrophysiological correlates , 1993 .

[21]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[22]  G. Thierry,et al.  Familiar words capture the attention of 11-month-olds in less than 250 ms , 2003, Neuroreport.

[23]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Molfese Electrophysiological correlates of word meanings in 14-month-old human infants , 1989 .

[26]  S Sutton,et al.  ERP components in picture matching in children and adults. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[27]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Dennis L. Molfese,et al.  Auditory evoked responses recorded from 16-month-old human infants to words they did and did not know , 1990, Brain and Language.

[29]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[32]  H. Neville,et al.  Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event‐related brain potentials , 1992 .

[33]  H. Neville,et al.  Language Acquisition and Cerebral Specialization in 20-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Word and Picture Processing in Children: An Event-Related Potential Study , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[36]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[37]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[39]  G. Dawson,et al.  Human behavior and the developing brain , 1994 .

[40]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.