The purpose of dynamic modeling and simulation of Advanced Life Support (ALS) systems is to help design them. Static steady state systems analysis provides basic information and is necessary to guide dynamic modeling, but static analysis is not sufficient to design and compare systems. ALS systems must respond to external input variations and internal off-nominal behavior. Buffer sizing, resupply scheduling, failure response, and control system design are aspects of dynamic system design. We develop two dynamic mass flow models and use them in simulations to evaluate systems issues, optimize designs, and make system design trades. One model is of nitrogen leakage in the space station, the other is of a waste processor failure in a regenerative life support system. Most systems analyses are concerned with optimizing the cost/benefit of a system at its nominal steady-state operating point. ALS analysis must go beyond the static steady state to include dynamic system design. All life support systems exhibit behavior that varies over time. ALS systems must respond to equipment operating cycles, repair schedules, and occasional off-nominal behavior or malfunctions. Biological components, such as bioreactors, composters, and food plant growth chambers, usually have operating cycles or other complex time behavior. Buffer sizes, material stocks, and resupply rates determine dynamic system behavior and directly affect system mass and cost. Dynamic simulation is needed to avoid the extremes of costly over-design of buffers and material reserves or system failure due to insufficient buffers and lack of stored material.
[1]
Paul Wieland.
Designing For Human Presence in Space: An Introduction to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS)
,
2005
.
[2]
Harry Jones.
Survey of Modeling Failures, Dynamics, and Nonlinearities in Advanced Life Support Systems
,
2001
.
[3]
Raymond M. Wheeler,et al.
CELSS Engineering Parameters
,
1993
.
[4]
Harry Jones,et al.
Top-Level Crop Models for Advanced Life Support Analysis
,
2000
.
[5]
Patrick Sevestre,et al.
Linear Dynamic Models
,
1992
.
[6]
Cory K. Finn.
Dynamic System Modeling of Regenerative Life Support Systems
,
1999
.
[7]
R M Wheeler,et al.
An approach to crop modeling with the energy cascade.
,
1995,
Life support & biosphere science : international journal of earth space.
[8]
A Drysdale,et al.
Object-oriented model-driven control.
,
1994,
Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.
[9]
Cory K. Finn,et al.
Steady-State System Mass Balance for the BIO-Plex
,
1998
.
[10]
R C Spear,et al.
Dynamic considerations for control of closed life support systems.
,
1984,
Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.
[11]
Harry Jones.
Nonlinear Dynamic Models in Advanced Life Support
,
2002
.
[12]
Harry Jones,et al.
Design Rules for Space Life Support Systems
,
2003
.