Exploring the Development of Endorsed Learning Resources Profiles in the Connexions Repository

Existing learning object repositories are adopting strategies for quality assessment and recommendation of materials that rely on information provided by their community of users, such as ratings, comments, and tags. In this direction, Connexions has implemented an innovative approach for quality assurance where resources are socially endorsed by distinct members and organizations through the use of the so-called lenses. This kind of evaluative information constitutes a referential body of knowledge that can be used to create profiles of endorsed learning resources that, in their turn, can be further used in the process of automated quality assessment. The present paper explores the development of endorsed learning resources profiles based on intrinsic features of the resources, and initially evaluates the use of these profiles on the creation of automated models for quality evaluation.

[1]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Statistical profiles of highly-rated web sites , 2002, CHI.

[2]  Erik Duval,et al.  Relevance Ranking Metrics for Learning Objects , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[3]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Errors on Human-Generated Learning Objects Metadata , 2009, MTSR.

[4]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[5]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Statistical profiles of highly-rated learning objects , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Ioannis N. Athanasiadis,et al.  Metadata and Semantic Research - 4th International Conference, MTSR 2010, Alcalá de Henares, Spain, October 20-22, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, MTSR.

[7]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  INFORMATION QUALITY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIA , 2005 .

[8]  Les Gasser,et al.  Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia , 2005, ICIQ.

[9]  Xavier Ochoa Connexions: a Social and Successful Anomaly among Learning Object Repositories , 2010 .

[10]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  Using Machine Learning to Support Quality Judgments , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[11]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Preliminary Explorations on the Statistical Profiles of Highly-Rated Learning Objects , 2009, MTSR.

[12]  Joshua Evan Blumenstock,et al.  Size matters: word count as a measure of quality on wikipedia , 2008, WWW.

[13]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Complete metadata records in learning object repositories: some evidence and requirements , 2005, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[14]  Juan Manuel Dodero,et al.  Ranking Learning Objects through Integration of Different Quality Indicators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[15]  Salvador Sánchez-Alonso,et al.  Analyzing Associations between the Different Ratings Dimensions of the MERLOT Repository , 2011 .

[16]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Social models in open learning object repositories: A simulation approach for sustainable collections , 2011, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[17]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality Assurance , 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Ramón Ovelar,et al.  Repository 2.0: Social Dynamics to Support Community Building in Learning Object Repositories , 2008 .