Finite element and meshless methods in NDT applications

Eddy current nondestructive testing (NDT) methods are extensively used in the inspection of aging aircrafts. Thousands of fasteners and bonded joints on each aircraft should be inspected and in order to handle the huge task, fast, accurate and cost effective inspection methods are clearly needed. Some of the challenges encountered in eddy current testing are (1) detection of corrosions or cracks in the multi-layer structures, (2) detection of cracks under the fastener (CUF), (3) detection of surface and subsurface defects close to edges. Conventional eddy current inspection method is time consuming due to the small probe size and large inspection area. Furthermore it requires trained operators for data interpretation. Development of new techniques for rapid and accurate inspection is of considerable interest to the aviation industry. In this dissertation, a more recent eddy current technique called magneto-optic imaging (MOI) is studied. The availability of a theoretical model that can simulate the MOI system performance is extremely important for understanding and optimizing the MOI sensor and hardware system. In this dissertation, finite element (FE) methods have been applied to numerically compute the electromagnetic fields associated with MOI testing with respect to variation in parameters such as operating frequency, source current and sensor parameters. Most of the testing geometries are three-dimensional and consequently the FE models require extensive computational resources. This paper presents a robust FE model based on A-V formulation and a fast iterative solver, which offers a distinct advantage in terms of computational time and data storage. A major contribution of this work is the development of Element-Free Galerkin (EFG) method for NDE applications. In order to model the complex CUF geometry, EFG method has been studied. Two and three-dimensional models for Poisson equation and diffusion equation, describing static or low frequency problems, have been developed and compared with conventional FE methods. EFG methods have also been applied to multi-frequency and pulsed eddy current problems. Simulation results clearly demonstrate the feasibility of the method for time-dependent field applications.

[1]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[2]  Chao Chen Finite element modeling of MOI for NDE applications , 2000 .

[3]  R. Mesquita,et al.  Moving least square reproducing kernel method for electromagnetic field computation , 1999 .

[4]  D. Bray Nondestructive Evaluation , 2018 .

[5]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[6]  Xiaoxu,et al.  New Matrix Assembly Techniques forMeshless Methods , 1999 .

[7]  J. Slonczewski,et al.  Magnetic domain walls in bubble materials , 1979 .

[8]  K. Preis,et al.  On the use of the magnetic vector potential in the finite-element analysis of three-dimensional eddy currents , 1989 .

[9]  Carretera de Valencia,et al.  The finite element method in electromagnetics , 2000 .

[10]  R. Ludwig,et al.  Numerical and analytical modeling of pulsed eddy currents in a conducting half-space , 1990 .

[11]  C. Dodd,et al.  ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS TO EDDY--CURRENT PROBE COIL PROBLEMS. , 1968 .

[12]  R. Freund,et al.  Transpose-Free Quasi-Minimal Residual Methods for Non-Hermitian Linear Systems , 1994 .

[13]  D. Thompson,et al.  Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , 1982 .

[14]  R. Mittra,et al.  Computational Methods for Electromagnetics , 1997 .

[15]  Christian Magele,et al.  Different finite element formulations of 3D magnetostatic fields , 1992 .

[16]  K. Preis,et al.  Finite element analysis of 3-D eddy currents , 1990 .

[17]  John R. Bowler,et al.  Pulsed eddy-current response to a conducting half-space , 1997 .

[18]  John C. Moulder,et al.  Impedance of a coil near an imperfectly layered metal structure: The layer approximation , 1996 .

[19]  Andrew H. Eschenfelder,et al.  Magnetic Bubble Technology , 1980 .

[20]  S. Simms MOI: magneto-optic/eddy current imaging , 1993 .

[21]  Lalita Udpa,et al.  Eddy Current Nondestructive Evaluation , 1999 .

[22]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[23]  L. Trefethen,et al.  Numerical linear algebra , 1997 .

[24]  Sarit Sharma Application of finite element models to eddy current probe design for aircraft inspection , 1998 .

[25]  C. Trowbridge,et al.  The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields , 1992 .

[26]  Erol Uzal,et al.  Pulsed Eddy-Current Measurements of Corrosion-Induced Metal Loss: Theory and Experiment , 1995 .

[27]  G. Scott,et al.  Magnetooptic properties and applications of bismuth substituted iron garnets , 1976 .

[28]  William C.L. Shih,et al.  Magneto-optic/eddy current imaging of aging aircraft: a new NDI technique , 1993 .

[29]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments , 1996 .

[30]  Shiyou Yang,et al.  Application of a meshless method in electromagnetics , 2001 .

[31]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[32]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  An introduction to programming the meshless Element F reeGalerkin method , 1998 .

[33]  Nathan Ida Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Electromagnetic Nondestructive Testing Phenomena. , 1983 .

[34]  K. Preis,et al.  Finite element analysis of 3D multiply connected eddy current problems , 1989, International Magnetics Conference.

[35]  Vlatko Cingoski,et al.  Element-free Galerkin method for electromagnetic field computations , 1998 .