In situ damage assessment using synchrotron X-rays in materials loaded by a Hopkinson bar

Split Hopkinson or Kolsky bars are common high-rate characterization tools for dynamic mechanical behaviour of materials. Stress–strain responses averaged over specimen volume are obtained as a function of strain rate. Specimen deformation histories can be monitored by high-speed imaging on the surface. It has not been possible to track the damage initiation and evolution during the dynamic deformation inside specimens except for a few transparent materials. In this study, we integrated Hopkinson compression/tension bars with high-speed X-ray imaging capabilities. The damage history in a dynamically deforming specimen was monitored in situ using synchrotron radiation via X-ray phase contrast imaging. The effectiveness of the novel union between these two powerful techniques, which opens a new angle for data acquisition in dynamic experiments, is demonstrated by a series of dynamic experiments on a variety of material systems, including particle interaction in granular materials, glass impact cracking, single crystal silicon tensile failure and ligament–bone junction damage.

[1]  Amos Gilat,et al.  A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain-rate testing , 1991 .

[2]  U. S. Lindholm Some experiments with the split hopkinson pressure bar , 1964 .

[3]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic-plastic materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar , 2005 .

[4]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  A novel dynamic friction experiment using a modified kolsky bar apparatus , 2000 .

[5]  Stephen M. Walley,et al.  Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies , 2004 .

[6]  C. Yew,et al.  Strain-Rate Effects in the Propagation of Torsional Plastic Waves , 1966 .

[7]  H. Kolsky An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading , 1949 .

[8]  B. Song,et al.  Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar , 2011 .

[9]  Mark L. Green,et al.  Development of a dynamic triaxial Kolsky bar , 2010 .

[10]  Kinya Ogawa,et al.  Impact-tension compression test by using a split-Hopkinson bar , 1984 .

[11]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Dynamic Compressive Failure of AlON Under Controlled Planar Confinement , 2008 .

[12]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  High Rates and Impact Experiments , 2008 .

[13]  Amos Gilat,et al.  Full Field Strain Measurement in Compression and Tensile Split Hopkinson Bar Experiments , 2009 .

[14]  F. Zernike Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects , 1942 .

[15]  J. Yamamuro,et al.  Effects of Strain Rate on Instability of Granular Soils , 1993 .

[16]  J. Duffy,et al.  On the Use of a Torsional Split Hopkinson Bar to Study Rate Effects in 1100-0 Aluminum , 1971 .

[17]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE CRUSHING OF SAND SUBJECTED TO HIGH PRESSURE ONE-DIMENSIONAL COMPRESSION , 2001 .

[19]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Tensile Testing of Materials at Impact Rates of Strain , 1960 .

[20]  Gray,et al.  Classic Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing , 2000 .

[21]  M. Nikl Scintillation detectors for x-rays , 2006 .

[22]  K. Ogawa Impact friction test method by applying stress wave , 1997 .

[23]  Timur E. Gureyev,et al.  On x-ray phase imaging with a point source , 1998 .

[24]  B. Hopkinson A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets , 2022 .

[25]  Characterization of D-T cryogenic layer formation in a Beryllium capsule using X-ray phase contrast imaging , 2006 .

[26]  B. Martin,et al.  Undrained high-pressure and high strain-rate response of dry sand under triaxial loading , 2013 .

[27]  T Shimada,et al.  Gas gun shock experiments with single-pulse x-ray phase contrast imaging and diffraction at the Advanced Photon Source. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[28]  Vikas Prakash,et al.  A modified torsional kolsky bar for investigating dynamic friction , 1999 .

[29]  Kamel Fezzaa,et al.  Dedicated full-field X-ray imaging beamline at Advanced Photon Source , 2007 .

[30]  L. M. Yeakley,et al.  High strain-rate testing: Tension and compression , 1968 .

[31]  M L Qi,et al.  High speed synchrotron x-ray phase contrast imaging of dynamic material response to split Hopkinson bar loading. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[32]  S. Wilkins,et al.  Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays , 1996, Nature.

[33]  B. Song,et al.  Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications , 2010 .

[34]  A. M. Sullivan,et al.  The effect of static and dynamic loading and temperature on the yield stress of iron and mild steel in compression , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[35]  Arunachalam M. Rajendran,et al.  Dynamic Fracture of Ceramics in Armor Applications , 2007 .

[36]  R. J. Christensen,et al.  Split-hopkinson-bar tests on rock under confining pressure , 1972 .