Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains

We propose that consumers often make choices that diverge from those of others to ensure that they effectively communicate desired identities. Consistent with this identity-signaling perspective, four studies illustrate that consumers are more likely to diverge from majorities, or members of other social groups, in product domains that are seen as symbolic of identity (e.g., music or hairstyles, rather than backpacks or stereos). In identity domains, participants avoided options preferred by majorities and abandoned preferences shared with majorities. The social group associated with a product influenced choice more in identity domains and when a given product was framed as identity relevant. People diverge, in part, to avoid communicating undesired identities.

[1]  S. Asch Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[2]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  Conflict.Kurt H. WolffThe Web of Group-Affiliations. Reinhard Bendix , Georg Simmel , 1956 .

[4]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[5]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[6]  James E. Stafford Effects of Group Influences on Consumer Brand Preferences , 1966 .

[7]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Affective and valuational consequences of self-perceived uniqueness deprivation , 1968 .

[8]  D. Byrne,et al.  Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristics as determinants of attraction. , 1969 .

[9]  H. Fromkin Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[11]  George P. Moschis,et al.  Social Comparison and Informal Group Influence , 1976 .

[12]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence , 1977 .

[13]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. , 1977 .

[14]  B. Calder,et al.  Interpersonal Influence on Consumer Behavior: An Attribution Theory Approach , 1977 .

[15]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[16]  Brian Torode,et al.  Subculture: The Meaning of Style. , 1981 .

[17]  R. Belk Determinants of Consumption Cue Utilization in Impression Formation: an Association Derivation and Experimental Verification , 1981 .

[18]  George B. Sproles Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles—Principles and Perspectives , 1981 .

[19]  M. Douglas,et al.  The World of Goods , 2021 .

[20]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism , 1982 .

[21]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[22]  M. Kernis,et al.  Need for uniqueness, self-schemas, and thought as moderators of the false-consensus effect , 1984 .

[23]  J. D. Campbell Similarity and uniqueness: the effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. R. Solomon The Forest or the Trees? A Gestalt Approach to Symbolic Consumption , 1987 .

[25]  Paul DiMaggio Classification in Art. , 1987 .

[26]  Terrence H. Witkowski,et al.  Marketing and semiotics : new directions in the study of signs for sale , 1987 .

[27]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[28]  R. Belk,et al.  Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities , 1989 .

[29]  J. Campbell,et al.  Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. , 1989 .

[30]  Jeffrey L. Meikle,et al.  Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities , 1989 .

[31]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal , 1990 .

[32]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  The role of attitude objects in attitude functions , 1990 .

[33]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[34]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective , 1993 .

[35]  M. R. Solomon,et al.  To Be and Not to Be: Lifestyle Imagery, Reference Groups, and The Clustering of America , 1995 .

[36]  Sarah Thornton Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital , 1995 .

[37]  M. Lynn,et al.  The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale , 1997 .

[38]  S. Levy Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[39]  G. Macdonald,et al.  Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity , 2000 .

[41]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[42]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .

[43]  Thomas C. O'Guinn,et al.  brand community , 2022, The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.

[44]  Kelly Tian,et al.  The Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness Scale , 2001 .

[45]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 2002 .

[46]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[47]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands , 2003 .

[48]  G. Tellis,et al.  Growing, Growing, Gone: Cascades, Diffusion, and Turning Points in the Product Life Cycle , 2004 .

[49]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[50]  You are what they eat. , 2005, Consumer reports.

[51]  Jennifer Edson Escalas,et al.  Self‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning , 2005 .

[52]  C. Heath,et al.  Divergence in Cultural Practices: Tastes as Signals of Identity , 2005 .

[53]  Divergence and Identity-signaling 1 from Whom Do People Diverge? Out-group Similarity, Identity-signaling, and Divergence , 2006 .

[54]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences , 2006 .

[55]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Alone in a crowd of sheep: asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  M. Douglas,et al.  Pour une anthropologie de la consommation : le monde des biens; The world of goods : towards an anthropology of consumption , 2008 .