Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment

Although automation is playing an increasing role on the ship's bridge, empirical research on the effectiveness of alternative bridge designs is limited. In this paper, we describe an experimental study of the benefits of integrated information display, using a computerized simulation of a highly automated ship's bridge. The study compared three types of interface design, which presented radar and electronic chart information to the operator in different ways: (a) integrated display, (b) functionally-separate display, and (c) spatially-separate display. Effects were examined in relation to time on watch and scenario complexity. Following extensive training on the task, 39 participants were tested over a 4-h experimental session, during which they encountered a sequence of collision scenarios of varying complexity. Using a dual-task methodology, a range of measures of primary and secondary task performance were taken, together with assessment of information sampling behaviour and subjective operator state (workload, fatigue, anxiety and situation awareness). The results indicated slight navigational advantages of the integrated display over the two alternative display types, although it also incurred higher levels of operator cost, particularly fatigue. There were no marked effects of time on watch, but more complex scenarios were associated with impaired performance, increased workload and reduced situation awareness. Overall, the findings have suggested some benefits of integrating primary information sources in a ship's bridge environment. The study further confirms the value of experimental simulations as tools for investigating design issues for ship's bridge automation.

[1]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attentional Filtering in the Design of Electronic Map Displays: A Comparison of Color Coding, Intensity Coding, and Decluttering Techniques , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[2]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[3]  William N. Dember,et al.  VIGILANCE AND WORKLOAD IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS. , 1996 .

[4]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Effects of Variable-Priority Training on Automation-Related Complacency: Performance and Eye Movements , 2000 .

[5]  Jürgen S. Sauer,et al.  Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[6]  J Sauer,et al.  A conceptual framework for designing micro-worlds for complex work domains: a case study of the Cabin Air Management System. , 2000, Computers in human behavior.

[7]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[9]  R Kaufmann,et al.  User trials on the colours and symbols for electronic charts. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  R. Hockey Stress and fatigue in human performance , 1984 .

[11]  Thomas E. Nygren,et al.  The Subjective Workload Assessment Technique: A Scaling Procedure for Measuring Mental Workload , 1988 .

[12]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Object displays and control of dynamic systems , 1994 .

[13]  Peter O. Passenier,et al.  The Effect of a Priori Probability and Complexity on Decision Making in a Supervisory Control Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  J Sauer,et al.  Effects of training on short- and long-term skill retention in a complex multiple-task environment , 2000, Ergonomics.

[16]  John Paulin Hansen,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Configural, Digital, and Temporal Information on Process Displays , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Jürgen S. Sauer,et al.  Effects of Sleep Deprivation and User Interface on Complex Performance: A Multilevel Analysis of Compensatory Control , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[18]  C D Wickens,et al.  Head-Up Displays: Effect of Clutter, Display Intensity, and Display Location on Pilot Performance , 1998 .

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[20]  G. P. Smeaton,et al.  Display Requirements for ECDIS/ARPA Overlay Systems , 1995 .

[21]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  J Sauer,et al.  Prospective memory: a secondary task with promise. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  G A C R N Captain Brooker,et al.  Collisions at Sea , 1975, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[24]  C. Wickens Human Factors in Vector Map Design: The Importance of Task-Display Dependence , 2000, Journal of Navigation.

[25]  R. Parasuraman Vigilance, monitoring, and search. , 1986 .

[26]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study , 1993 .

[27]  Rapid Thermal Multiprocessor,et al.  Supervisory Control of a , 1993 .

[28]  G. R. J. Hockey Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.