Influence of real-world environments on the motion of catalytic bubble-propelled micromotors.

Self-propelled autonomous micromachines have recently been tasked to carry out various roles in real environments. In this study, we expose the microjets to various types of water that are present in the real world, examples include tap water, rain water, lake water and sea water, and we sought to investigate their behaviors under real world conditions. We observed that the viability and mobility of the catalytic bubble jet engines are strongly influenced by the type of environmental water sample. Amongst the four water samples tested, the seawater sample exhibits the strongest influence, completely disabling any motions arising from the microjets. The motion of the microjets is also reduced in tap water, which contains large quantities of inorganic ions that have been purposely introduced into tap water via processing in water treatment plants. Lake water and rain water samples exhibited the least influence on the microjet's motion. All of the four water samples were also characterized by determining their ion compositions and conductivities, and we will show that there is a distinct correlation between the reduced mobility of the microjets with the ion content of the water found in real environments.

[1]  Alberto Escarpa,et al.  Superhydrophobic alkanethiol-coated microsubmarines for effective removal of oil. , 2012, ACS nano.

[2]  P. Fischer,et al.  Magnetically actuated propulsion at low Reynolds numbers: towards nanoscale control. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[3]  Oliver G. Schmidt,et al.  Rolled-up nanotech on polymers: from basic perception to self-propelled catalytic microengines. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  Thomas E Mallouk,et al.  Schooling behavior of light-powered autonomous micromotors in water. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  Oliver G. Schmidt,et al.  Versatile Approach for Integrative and Functionalized Tubes by Strain Engineering of Nanomembranes on Polymers , 2008 .

[6]  Martin Pumera,et al.  External-energy-independent polymer capsule motors and their cooperative behaviors. , 2011, Chemistry.

[7]  Martin Pumera,et al.  Magnetic Control of Tubular Catalytic Microbots for the Transport, Assembly, and Delivery of Micro‐objects , 2010 .

[8]  Walter F Paxton,et al.  Motility of catalytic nanoparticles through self-generated forces. , 2005, Chemistry.

[9]  Martin Pumera,et al.  Nanorobots: the ultimate wireless self-propelled sensing and actuating devices. , 2009, Chemistry, an Asian journal.

[10]  Ryan Pavlick,et al.  Intelligent, self-powered, drug delivery systems. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[11]  Martin Pumera,et al.  Poisoning of bubble propelled catalytic micromotors: the chemical environment matters , 2013, Nanoscale.

[12]  Ayusman Sen,et al.  Fantastic voyage: designing self-powered nanorobots. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  W. Xi,et al.  Rolled-up magnetic microdrillers: towards remotely controlled minimally invasive surgery. , 2013, Nanoscale.

[14]  Martin Pumera,et al.  Challenges of the movement of catalytic micromotors in blood. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[15]  R. Webster,et al.  Quantitative analysis of atmospheric volatile organic pollutants by thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry , 2013 .

[16]  Joseph Wang,et al.  Can man-made nanomachines compete with nature biomotors? , 2009, ACS nano.

[17]  M. Pumera Electrochemically powered self-propelled electrophoretic nanosubmarines. , 2010, Nanoscale.

[18]  Martin Pumera,et al.  Concentric bimetallic microjets by electrodeposition , 2013 .

[19]  Darrell Velegol,et al.  Chemo and phototactic nano/microbots. , 2009, Faraday discussions.

[20]  Wei Gao,et al.  Catalytically propelled micro-/nanomotors: how fast can they move? , 2012, Chemical record.

[21]  S. Balasubramanian,et al.  Template-assisted fabrication of salt-independent catalytic tubular microengines. , 2010, ACS nano.