PFEFFER'S Barriers to The Advance Of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder

Pfeffer's (1993) discussion of the causes and consequences of paradigm development led him to the conclusion that organizational scholars should place control over publication into the hands of a comparatively small elite group who would force a consensus by excluding views that diverge from a dominant paradigm. In his view. this action would lead to a number of positive benefits for organizational scholars and organizational studies in general. We argue from a different set of assumptions than those of Pfeffer. In our view. knowledge is socially constructed, and. thus, scholars are unable to make unambiguous claims on some absolute truth. Given this assumption, the enforced consensus and dominant paradigm called for by Pfeffer would lead to a stagnation in knowledge evolution. Further. we argue that the concept of consensus and its role in the evolution of knowledge has been overstated. In contrast to Pfeffer. we conclude that a high degree of consensus, however achieved, would suggest that the evolution...

[1]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[2]  J. Sayers.  Against Method , 2016 .

[3]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Toward a Reconceptualization of the Foundations of the Field , 1993 .

[4]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[5]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND DETERMINISM: SUSTAINING THE CONVERSATION* , 1993 .

[6]  Nancy Wyatt,et al.  The Science Question in Feminism , 1990 .

[7]  H. Longino.  Science as Social Knowledge , 1990 .

[8]  Donald N. McCloskey.  Why I am no Longer a Positivist , 1989 .

[9]  J. Pulido.  A Brief History of Time From the Big Bang to Black Holes , 1988 .

[10]  Christine Brooke-Rose,et al.  Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought , 1987 .

[11]  Stephen M. Stigler,et al.  The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 by Stephen M. Stigler (review) , 1986, Technology and Culture.

[12]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth. , 1985 .

[13]  Colin Camerer.  Redirecting research in business policy and strategy , 1985 .

[14]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategic Management and Determinism , 1984 .

[15]  Stephen Cole,et al.  The Hierarchy of the Sciences? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Chance and consensus in peer review. , 1981, Science.

[17]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .

[18]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Which researcher will get the grant? , 1979, Nature.

[19]  Funding the Sciences in University Departments. , 1973 .

[20]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  E. Schwartz,et al.  The quest for certainty. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[23]  J. Schumpeter.  经济分析史 = History of economic analysis , 1954 .

[24]  W. D. Wightman.  Scientific Method , 1932, Nature.

[25]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Quest for Certainty , 1929 .

[26]  W. Jevons.  Theory of Political Economy , 1965 .