Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.

The aim of this laboratory based study was to determine the shaping ability of Lightspeed nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. A total of 40 canals with four different shapes in terms of angle and position of curve were prepared with Lightspeed instruments using the stepback technique recommended by the manufacturer. This report describes the efficacy of the instruments in terms of prevalence of canal aberrations, the amount and direction of canal transportation, and overall postoperative shape. Preoperative and postoperative images of the canals were taken using a video camera attached to a computer with image analysis software. The preoperative and postoperative views were superimposed to highlight the amount and position of material removed during preparation. Only one (2.5%) zip and one elbow were created, with no ledges, perforations, danger zones, or blockages being produced. At specific points along the canal length there were highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between the canal shapes in total canal width and in the amount of resin removed from the inner and outer aspects of the curve. The direction of canal transportation at the end point of preparation was most frequently toward the outer aspect of the curve; although in half of the canals, transportation was either directed toward the inner aspect or not observed. At the apex of the curve, the beginning of the curve, and halfway to the orifice, transportation was reversed with the majority of canals being transported toward the inner aspect of the curve. Mean absolute transportation was small and was below 0.06 mm at every position except the orifice. Overall, Lightspeed rotary instruments prepared canals well and would appear to be a valuable addition to the endodontic armamentarium.

[1]  A. Wennberg In vitro assessment of the biocompatibility of dental materials--the millipore filter method. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[2]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .

[3]  P. Esposito,et al.  A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  Paul Michael Howell Dummer,et al.  Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 1 , 1992 .

[5]  Roig-Cayón Miguel,et al.  A comparison of molar root canal preparations using flexofile, canal master U, and heliapical instruments , 1994 .

[6]  A. L. Frank,et al.  The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. , 1980, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  W. L. Wildey,et al.  A new root canal instrument and instrumentation technique: a preliminary report. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  S. Montgomery,et al.  The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. , 1991, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  J. I. Ingle,et al.  A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. , 1961, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[10]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  F S Weine,et al.  The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. , 1975, Journal of Endodontics.

[12]  P M Dummer,et al.  A comparison of the ability of K-files and Hedstrom files to shape simulated root canals in resin blocks. , 1989, International endodontic journal.

[13]  P M Dummer,et al.  A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[14]  J B Roane,et al.  The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  E. Saunders,et al.  Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  J. Baumgartner,et al.  Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  O. Zmener,et al.  Effectiveness of two different methods for preparing curved root canals. , 1994, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[18]  R. Michelich,et al.  Instrumentation of root canals in molar using the step-down technique. , 1982, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  B. Briseño,et al.  Comparison by means of a computer-supported device of the enlarging characteristics of two different instruments. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  W. Pertot,et al.  Effects of the Flexogates and Canal Master U on root canal configuration in simulated curved canals. , 1994, International endodontic journal.