Impact of Patient and Target-Vessel Characteristics on Arterial and Venous Bypass Graft Patency: Insight From a Randomized Trial

Background— The purpose of this investigation was to determine optimal patient and target-vessel characteristics to maximize arterial and venous graft patency on the basis of data from a large clinical trial. Methods and Results— Angiographic data on 440 radial artery grafts and 440 saphenous vein grafts were analyzed with methodology to account for within-patient clustering. Multivariable models that incorporated patient demographic, operative, anatomic, and postdischarge medical management were constructed to determine predictors of graft occlusion. Radial artery use was strongly protective against graft occlusion at 1 year after adjustment for all covariates, with a larger protective effect seen in women (P=0.05 for a subgroup-by-treatment interaction). Among all grafts, diabetes and small target-vessel diameter were associated with an increased risk of graft occlusion, and grafting to a target vessel with more severe proximal stenosis was associated with a decreased risk of graft occlusion. With regard to gender, radial artery graft occlusion at 1 year occurred in similar proportions of men (8.6%) and women (5.3%, P=0.6), whereas, for saphenous vein grafts the comparable occlusion rates were 12.0% and 23.3% respectively (P=0.02). A history of peripheral vascular disease was associated with an elevated risk of radial artery occlusion but was not associated with early vein graft occlusion (P=0.02 for a subgroup-by-treatment interaction). Conclusions— Patients benefit from radial artery–coronary artery bypass conduits as opposed to saphenous vein conduits, and this effect is especially strong in women. Small target-vessel size adversely affected graft patency, and grafting to a target vessel with more severe proximal stenosis improved graft patency.

[1]  M. Spence,et al.  Letter by Spence et al regarding article, "Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial". , 2007, Circulation.

[2]  W. Cantor,et al.  Impact of radial artery cannulation for coronary angiography and angioplasty on radial artery function. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  R. Wiseth,et al.  Radial artery diameter and vasodilatory properties after transradial coronary angiography. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  C. Staniloae,et al.  Nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, or both, in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial artery catheterization. , 2006, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[5]  N. Desai,et al.  Radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Eugene H Blackstone,et al.  Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  J. Copeland,et al.  Saphenous Vein Graft Patency 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy , 2005 .

[8]  N. Yokoyama,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound analysis of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  C David Naylor,et al.  A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Bett,et al.  Five-Year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Bypass Grafts , 2004, Circulation.

[11]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B. Buxton,et al.  Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 2002. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[13]  A. Yamashina,et al.  Arterial conduit shear stress following bypass grafting for intermediate coronary artery stenosis: a comparative study with saphenous vein grafts. , 2003, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

[14]  B. Buxton,et al.  Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years , 2004 .

[15]  B. Buxton,et al.  Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  J. Raman,et al.  Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  G. Watanabe,et al.  Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  Eugene H Blackstone,et al.  Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency? , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  L. Mickleborough,et al.  Gender differences in quality of distal vessels: effect on results of coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  R. Frye,et al.  Coronary Bypass Graft Patency in Patients With Diabetes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  E Guarda,et al.  Predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass operations. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  P. Ruengsakulrach,et al.  Prevalence and prediction of calcification and plaques in radial artery grafts by ultrasound. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  N L Geller,et al.  Prognostic factors for atherosclerosis progression in saphenous vein grafts: the postcoronary artery bypass graft (Post-CABG) trial. Post-CABG Trial Investigators. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  S. Fremes,et al.  Multicenter radial artery patency study (RAPS). Study design. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[25]  F. Loop,et al.  Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  F. Stockenhuber,et al.  Assessing coronary stenosis. Quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images. , 1996, European heart journal.

[27]  H. Mallidi,et al.  The Technique of Radial Artery Bypass Grafting and Early Clinical Results , 1995, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[28]  Thomas E. Moritz,et al.  Long-term graft patency (3 years) after coronary artery surgery. Effects of aspirin: results of a VA Cooperative study. , 1994, Circulation.

[29]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Vasoreactivity of the Radial Artery Comparison With the Internal Mammary and Gastroepiploic Arteries With Implications for Coronary Artery Surgery , 1993, Circulation.

[30]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[31]  J. Copeland,et al.  Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. , 1989, Circulation.

[32]  W G Henderson,et al.  The statistical analysis of graft patency data in a clinical trial of antiplatelet agents following coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1988, Controlled clinical trials.

[33]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  J. Burton,et al.  Coronary Bypass Graft Fate: Angiographic Grading of 1400 Consecutive Grafts Early after Operation and of 1132 after One Year , 1978, Circulation.