Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects.

The psychological and legal literature concerning evidence of bias or unfairness in the employment interview with regard to blacks, females, handicapped persons, and the elderly is reviewed. This review indicates that (a) the interview is highly vulnerable to legal attack and one can expect more future litigation in this area; (b) the mechanisms and processes that contribute to bias in the interview are not well specified by researchers; (c) findings based predominantly on resume research show that females tend to receive lower evaluations than males, but this varies as a function of job and other situational characteristics; (d) little evidence exists to confirm the notion that blacks are evaluated unfairly in interview contexts; (e) a relative dearth of research exists investigating interview bias against the elderly and handicapped individuals; and (f) evidence concerning the differential validity of the interview for these minority and nonminority groups is virtually nonexistent. A number of research needs and directions are specified. Despite research that indicates that the employment interview has limited reliability and validity (Mayfield, 1964; Ulrich & Trumbo, 1965; Wright, 1969), organizational use of the interview in helping to make selection and promotion decisions persists. The statement of Dunnette and Bass (1963) that the personnel interview is the most widely used method of selecting employees still holds true today, In fact, there is some speculation that the employment interview may be gaining in popularity because of increased court and legal pressures brought to bear on employers' pencil-and-paper testing practices. In view of the increased likelihood of their employment tests' being subjected to legal scrutiny, employers are dropping the use of tests and placing even more

[1]  Compton Ae.  Employment and the disabled. , 1980 .

[2]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. , 1975 .

[3]  R. Schuler.  Fairness in selecting employees , 1979 .

[4]  R. Shikiar,et al.  Sexual discrimination in the use of letters of recommendation: A case of reverse discrimination. , 1978 .

[5]  The job interview: Body language and perceptions of potential effectiveness. , 1978 .

[6]  M. Hitt,et al.  Influence of Sex and Scholastic Performance on Reactions to Job Applicant Resumes , 1978 .

[7]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Marital Status, and Educational Background on Selection Decisions , 1978 .

[8]  Gerald L. Rose,et al.  Sex Effects on Managerial Hiring Decisions , 1978 .

[9]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Experimenter sex effects in behavioral research. , 1977 .

[10]  P. Muchinsky,et al.  The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations , 1977 .

[11]  H. Heneman.  Impact of test information and applicant sex on applicant evaluations in a selection simulation. , 1977 .

[12]  Thomas F. Cash,et al.  Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. , 1977 .

[13]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations. , 1977 .

[14]  A. Imada,et al.  Influence of nonverbal communication and rater proximity on impressions and decisions in simulated employment interviews. , 1977 .

[15]  J. Terborg,et al.  Women in management: A research review. , 1977 .

[16]  J. Haefner.  Race, age, sex, and competence as factors in employer selection of the disadvantaged. , 1977 .

[17]  S. Zedeck,et al.  Capturing rater policies for processing evaluation data. , 1977, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[18]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Reactions of College Recruiters to Interviewee Sex and Self-Presentation Style. , 1977 .

[19]  John W. Lounsbury,et al.  Job analysis results as influenced by sex of incumbent and sex of analyst. , 1977 .

[20]  A. Brief,et al.  The Impact of Applicant Disability on Evaluative Judgments in the Selection Process , 1976 .

[21]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Critical analysis of the statistical and ethical implications of various definitions of test bias. , 1976 .

[22]  Thomas H. Jerdee,et al.  The influence of age stereotypes on managerial decisions. , 1976 .

[23]  Thomas H. Jerdee,et al.  The nature of job-related age stereotypes. , 1976 .

[24]  Manuel London,et al.  Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and interview contexts. , 1976 .

[25]  L. Heal,et al.  Private Employment Agency Responses to the Physically Handicapped Applicant in a Wheelchair , 1976, Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling.

[26]  N. Schmitt.  Social and Situational Determinants of Interview Decisions: Implications for the Employment Interview. , 1976 .

[27]  M. R. Novick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF SOME MODELS FOR CULTURE-FAIR SELECTION , 1976 .

[28]  W. J. Bigoness,et al.  Effect of applicant's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. , 1976 .

[29]  Stephen L. Cohen,et al.  Subtle effects of sex role stereotypes on recruiters' hiring decisions. , 1975 .

[30]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. , 1975 .

[31]  B. Babcock.  Sex Discrimination and the Law: Causes and Remedies , 1975 .

[32]  D. Ilgen,et al.  A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations , 1975 .

[33]  V. E. Schein.  Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  Demonstration of the Effect, “Similar to Me,” in Simulated Employment Interviews , 1975 .

[35]  Milton D. Hakel,et al.  The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability? , 1975 .

[36]  N. Feather.  Positive and negative reactions to male and female success and failure in relation to the perceived status and sex-typed appropriateness of occupations. , 1975 .

[37]  N. Feather,et al.  Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Joseph M. Hillery,et al.  Black-White Differences in Nonverbal Behavior in an Interview Setting. , 1974 .

[39]  W. Clay Hamner,et al.  Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. , 1974 .

[40]  Y. Wiener,et al.  Use of job information as a criterion in employment decisions of interviewers. , 1974 .

[41]  Marsha B. Jacobson,et al.  Sex roles and leadership: Perceptions of the leaders and the led , 1974 .

[42]  K. Schaie,et al.  Translations in gerontology--from lab to life. Intellectual functioning. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[43]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Relationship of role conflict and role ambiguity to job involvement measures. , 1974 .

[44]  B. Rosen,et al.  Effects of applicant's sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. , 1974 .

[45]  B. Rosen,et al.  Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions. , 1974 .

[46]  N. Cole.  BIAS IN SELECTION , 1973 .

[47]  K. Thomas,et al.  Age and sex as employment variables: Views of employment service interviewers. , 1973 .

[48]  R. J. Paul,et al.  Perceived Importance of Selected Variables Used to Evaluate Male and Female Job Applicants. , 1973 .

[49]  L. Humphreys.  Statistical definitions of test validity for minority groups. , 1973 .

[50]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  Training interviewers to eliminate contrast effects in employment interviews. , 1973 .

[51]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment , 1973 .

[52]  V. E. Schein.  The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. , 1973, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  John A. Langdale,et al.  Estimating the influence of job information on interviewer agreement. , 1973 .

[54]  W. Hays.  Statistics for the social sciences , 1973 .

[55]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Who Likes Competent Women? Competence, Sex-Role Congruence of Interests, and Subjects' Attitudes Toward Women as Determinants of Interpersonal Attraction1 , 1972 .

[56]  E. Shaw.  DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF NEGATIVE STEREOTYPING IN EMPLOYEE SELECTION , 1972 .

[57]  Virginia R. Boehm.  Negro-white differences in validity of employment and training selection procedures: Summary of rese , 1972 .

[58]  S. Z. Nagi,et al.  Work, Employment and the Disabled* , 1972 .

[59]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[60]  R. L. Thorndike.  CONCEPTS OF CULTURE-FAIRNESS , 1971 .

[61]  L. Fidell.  Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. , 1970 .

[62]  Orman R. Wright.  SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON THE SELECTION INTERVIEW SINCE 1964 , 1969 .

[63]  M. Karlins,et al.  On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  R. B. Ewen,et al.  Testing and Fair Employment: Fairness and Validity Of Personnel Tests For Different Ethnic Groups , 1969 .

[65]  T. Cleary.  TEST BIAS: PREDICTION OF GRADES OF NEGRO AND WHITE STUDENTS IN INTEGRATED COLLEGES , 1968 .

[66]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[67]  Felix M. Lopez.  3. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN TEST PERFORMANCE OF JOB APPLICANTS: I , 1966 .

[68]  D. Trumbo,et al.  THE SELECTION INTERVIEW SINCE 1949. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  Eugene C. Mayfield.  THE SELECTION INTERVIEW— A RE‐EVALUATION OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH , 1964 .

[70]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  Decision making in the employment interview , 1964 .

[71]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  Behavioral Scientists and Personnel Management , 1963 .

[72]  D. Katz.  THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .