Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility – The case of Germany

Abstract The current momentum in the electrification of the car fuels hope for a transition in mobility. However, electric vehicles have failed before and it is thus asked: What is the potential of e-mobility developing as a sustainable system innovation? In order to deal with this challenge analytically, a theoretical framework is developed: the concepts of transformative capacity of a new technology (do electric vehicles trigger ‘social’ innovations, e.g. new business models or use patterns?) and system adaptability (how stable is the mobility regime?) are introduced and the issue of sustainability is discussed. This framework will be explored for the German innovation system for e-mobility. It can be shown that electric cars will only be successful when part of a system innovation and that the German innovation system is dominated by regime actors and thus potentially used as a way to fend off more substantial change.

[1]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[2]  Stefanie Kettner,et al.  E-mobility in Germany: White hope for a sustainable development or Fig leaf for particular interests? , 2013 .

[3]  Andreas Knie,et al.  Einfach aufladen: mit Elektromobilitaet in eine saubere Zukunft , 2011 .

[4]  Ulrich Dolata,et al.  Transformative Capacity, Adaptability, Patterns of Change: An Analytical Framework , 2009 .

[5]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective , 2007 .

[6]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview , 2011 .

[7]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis , 2004 .

[8]  Renate Mayntz.  Über Governance: Institutionen und Prozesse politischer Regelung , 2009 .

[9]  Maurie J. Cohen.  A Social Problems Framework for the Critical Appraisal of Automobility and Sustainable Systems Innovation , 2006 .

[10]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability , 2004 .

[11]  Patrick Plötz,et al.  Status Quo und Perspektiven der Elektromobilität in Deutschland , 2011 .

[12]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[13]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Coevolutionary ecological economics , 2010 .

[14]  R. Kemp,et al.  The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems , 2005 .

[15]  Gerd Bender.  Technologieentwicklung als Institutionalisierungsprozess , 2006 .

[16]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): the dynamics of regime transformation , 2006 .

[17]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[18]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850-1930) , 2006 .

[19]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[20]  Karl Georg Høyer,et al.  The History of Alternative Fuels in Transportation: The Case of Electric and Hybrid Cars , 2008 .

[21]  T. Foxon.  A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[22]  Renato J. Orsato,et al.  The emergence of an electric mobility trajectory , 2013 .

[23]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects , 2009 .

[24]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Automobility in transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport , 2012 .

[25]  G. Kramer,et al.  A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles , 2010 .

[26]  J. Meadowcroft.  What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[27]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[28]  Garnet Kasperk,et al.  Geschäftsmodelle entlang der elektromobilen Wertschöpfungskette , 2013 .

[29]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity , 2011 .

[30]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Sustainable mobility: from technological innovation to societal learning , 2007 .

[31]  Anna Stamp,et al.  Environmental impacts of a transition toward e-mobility: the present and future role of lithium carbonate production , 2012 .

[32]  J. Voss,et al.  Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors , 2008 .

[33]  H. Sachsse,et al.  Technik und Gesellschaft , 1983 .

[34]  Johan Schot,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2002 .

[35]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Technikforschung: Fragestellungen und Erklärungsansätze , 1995 .

[36]  Harald Rohracher.  Die Wechselwirkung technischen und institutionellen Wandels in der Transformation von Energiesystemen , 2007 .

[37]  Peter Erskine Wells,et al.  U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry , 2007 .

[38]  Franklin Farell.  Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[39]  Frank Boons,et al.  Transition through subsystem innovation? The case of traffic management , 2010 .

[40]  Arie Rip,et al.  The Rise of Membrane Technology , 1998 .