An Empirical Analysis to Assess the Operational Design Domain of Lane Keeping System Equipped Vehicles Combining Objective and Subjective Risk Measures

Lower levels of automation are designed to work in specific conditions referred to as the Operational Design Domain (ODD). Beyond these conditions, the human driver is expected to take control. A mismatch between a driver's understanding and expectations of the automated vehicle capabilities and its actual capabilities as prescribed in the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) manual, could affect their safety and trust in automation. The main aim of this study is to develop a method for assessing the ODD of lane keeping system equipped vehicles. The analysis method is composed of an objective driving risk measure based on the Probabilistic Driving Risk Field (PDRF), and a subjective risk measure based on driver behavior, trust and situation awareness. We demonstrate the method applicability using the Automated Lane Keeping system of the Tesla Model S. A field test was conducted with 19 participants on public roads in the Netherlands including situations within and outside the defined ODD by the OEM. Across all test situations, a mismatch was observed between the ODD specified by the OEM and by the driver. Situations outside the ODD (i.e. no-lane markings and on/off-ramp) were often regarded as within the ODD by the participants. Situations inside the ODD (i.e. tunnel and curve) were mostly correctly classified by the participants. This analysis method has the potential to aid OEMs and road operators in defining more clearly the ODD while taking into account the driver's safety and awareness of the system capabilities.

[1]  K. Patil Cochran's Q Test: Exact Distribution , 1975 .

[2]  Ying Wang,et al.  Does cognitive distraction improve or degrade lane keeping performance? Analysis of time-to-line crossing safety margins , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[3]  Nariman Sepehri,et al.  Automated steering controller design for vehicle lane keeping combining linear active disturbance rejection control and quantitative feedback theory , 2018, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[4]  Riender Happee,et al.  Probabilistic field approach for motorway driving risk assessment , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[5]  Dot Hs Use of Advanced In-Vehicle Technology By Young and Older Early Adopters , 2008 .

[6]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Behavioural impacts of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems - an overview. , 2001 .

[7]  Mark R. Lehto,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[8]  Miguel Leitão,et al.  Driver's behavioral adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): the case of speed and time headway. , 2014, Journal of safety research.

[9]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Design of lane keeping assist system for autonomous vehicles , 2015, 2015 7th International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS).

[10]  William Payre,et al.  Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car , 2017 .

[11]  Ronen Lerner,et al.  Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey , 2012, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  Jochen Pohl,et al.  A LANE KEEPING ASSIST SYSTEM FOR PASSENGER CARS - DESIGN ASPECTS OF THE USER INTERFACE , 2003 .

[13]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Modelling decisions of control transitions and target speed regulations in full-range Adaptive Cruise Control based on Risk Allostasis Theory , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[14]  Mohamed M Ahmed,et al.  Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data. , 2019, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Bert Breuer,et al.  Distance behaviour on motorways with regard to active safety: a comparison between adaptive-cruise-control (ACC) and driver , 2001 .

[16]  Jasper J. A. Pauwelussen,et al.  Driver Behavior Analysis During ACC Activation and Deactivation in a Real Traffic Environment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[18]  Rosie Huggins,et al.  Assessment of Key Road Operator Actions to Support Automated Vehicles , 2018 .

[19]  J. Krems,et al.  Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study , 2015 .

[20]  D. M. Hoedemaeker Driving with intelligent vehicles: driving behaviour with Adaptive Cruise Control and the acceptance by individual drivers , 1999 .

[21]  Wenshuo Wang,et al.  Evaluation of Lane Departure Correction Systems Using a Regenerative Stochastic Driver Model , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[22]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  Investigation of Behavioral Adaptation to Lane Departure Warnings , 2002 .

[23]  Meng Wang,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Safety Indicators for Vehicle Trajectories on Highways , 2016 .

[24]  Masooda N. Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Use of crash surrogates and exceedance statistics to estimate road safety. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Wendy Macdonald,et al.  Review of Relationships Between Steering Wheel Reversal Rate and Driving Task Demand , 1980 .

[27]  Erdong Chen,et al.  Effectiveness of cable barriers, guardrails, and concrete barrier walls in reducing the risk of injury. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[29]  Paul A. Green Standard definitions for driving measures and statistics: overview and status of recommended practice J2944 , 2013, AutomotiveUI.

[30]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. , 1984, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[31]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[32]  Yang Li,et al.  The Driving Safety Field Based on Driver–Vehicle–Road Interactions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  J Navarro,et al.  Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.