Audiometric Pattern in Moderate and Severe Tympanic Membrane Retraction

Objective: To evaluate the audiometric pattern in moderate/severe retractions of the tympanic membrane and correlate it with the severity of the otoscopy findings. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Patients: Consecutive patients with moderate or severe tympanic membrane retraction in at least one ear (451 ears) between August 2000 and January 2019, and no surgical history or effusion (mean [standard deviation] age, 32.8 [20.2] yr; 54% female and 42.4% children). Intervention: Pure-tone audiometry. Main Outcome Measures: Air conduction (AC) and bone conduction thresholds, and air-bone gap (ABG) measured at the four-frequency pure-tone average. Results: The median in decibel hearing level (dB HL) (minimum–maximum) of the AC, BC, and ABG were 25 dB HL (0–120 dB HL), 10 dB HL (0–75 dB HL), and 12.5 dB HL (0–55 dB HL), respectively. Seventy-two percent of the ears had an ABG ≤ 20 dB HL. For severity of the retraction of pars flaccida (PF), the AC, bone conduction, and ABG were similar across groups, with a weak correlation. For the pars tensa (PT), there was a global difference in the medians of AC and ABG in terms of the degree of severity, with a moderate correlation. Retraction in PF and PT at the same time was observed in 6 4% of the ears. ABG median was lower in ears with PF retraction (6.25 dB HL) than PT retraction, isolated (15 dB HL) or not (13.75 dB HL; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The ABG pure-tone average median was higher when PT was involved. We found a significant correlation between the retraction severity and worsening of AC and ABG thresholds, only for PT.

[1]  J. Dornhoffer,et al.  State of the Art: Reconstruction with Synthetic PORP and TORP , 2019, Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports.

[2]  E. Olszewska,et al.  Assessment and management of retraction pockets. , 2017, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.

[3]  A. Jotić,et al.  Pars Tensa Retractions Without Cholesteatoma in Children: Predictors for Ossicular Chain Destruction, Air Conduction Thresholds, and Postoperative Retractions , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  I. Saliba,et al.  Tympanic membrane retraction pocket staging: is it worthwhile? , 2014, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[5]  Yingzi He,et al.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[6]  S. D. da Costa,et al.  Myringostapediopexy: Is it a Natural Type III Tympanoplasty? , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  N. Chadha,et al.  Tympanic membrane retraction: An endoscopic evaluation of staging systems , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  M. Yung,et al.  Randomized Study Comparing Fascia and Cartilage Grafts in Myringoplasty , 2011, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  M. Rovers,et al.  Ossiculoplasty in Intact Stapes and Malleus Patients: A Comparison of PORPs Versus TORPs With Malleus Relocation and Silastic Banding Techniques , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  V. Raut,et al.  Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  M. Bernal-Sprekelsen,et al.  Type III Tympanoplasty With Titanium Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis: Anatomic and Functional Results , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  V. Raut,et al.  Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty--follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results. , 2010, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[13]  M. Cassano,et al.  Retraction pockets of pars tensa in pediatric patients: clinical evolution and treatment. , 2010, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[14]  I. Bruce,et al.  Erosion of the incus in pediatric posterior tympanic membrane retraction pockets without cholesteatoma. , 2008, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[15]  M. Elsheikh,et al.  Cartilage Tympanoplasty for Management of Tympanic Membrane Atelectasis: Is Ventilatory Tube Necessary? , 2006, Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  J. Dornhoffer Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[17]  E. Monsell,et al.  New and Revised Reporting Guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  H. L. Tay,et al.  Tympanic membrane atelectasis in childhood otitis media with effusion , 1995, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[19]  R. Mills Management of retraction pockets of the pars tensa , 1991, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[20]  J. Sadé,et al.  Atelectasis and Secretory Otitis Media , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.