Breaking the news on mobile TV: user requirements of a popular mobile content

This paper presents the results from three lab-based studies that investigated different ways of delivering Mobile TV News by measuring user responses to different encoding bitrates, image resolutions and text quality. All studies were carried out with participants watching News content on mobile devices, with a total of 216 participants rating the acceptability of the viewing experience. Study 1 compared the acceptability of a 15-second video clip at different video and audio encoding bit rates on a 3G phone at a resolution of 176x144 and an iPAQ PDA (240x180). Study 2 measured the acceptability of video quality of full feature news clips of 2.5 minutes which were recorded from broadcast TV, encoded at resolutions ranging from 120x90 to 240x180, and combined with different encoding bit rates and audio qualities presented on an iPAQ. Study 3 improved the legibility of the text included in the video simulating a separate text delivery. The acceptability of News' video quality was greatly reduced at a resolution of 120x90. The legibility of text was a decisive factor in the participants' assessment of the video quality. Resolutions of 168x126 and higher were substantially more acceptable when they were accompanied by optimized high quality text compared to proportionally scaled inline text. When accompanied by high quality text TV news clips were acceptable to the vast majority of participants at resolutions as small as 168x126 for video encoding bitrates of 160kbps and higher. Service designers and operators can apply this knowledge to design a cost-effective mobile TV experience.

[1]  Mickie Edwardson,et al.  Television News Information Gain: Videotex versus a Talking Head. , 1985 .

[2]  Byron Reeves,et al.  The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal Media Psychology , 1999 .

[3]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Can small be beautiful?: assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.

[4]  Yutaka Matsushita,et al.  Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design , 1994, CSCW '94.

[5]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[6]  Matthew C. Valenti,et al.  Digital Video Broadcasting , 2004 .

[7]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[8]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Sharp or smooth?: comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video , 2004, CHI '04.

[9]  D A Owens,et al.  Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  V. Michael Bove,et al.  Television Sound and Viewer Perceptions , 1991 .

[11]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  The effects of spatial and temporal video distortion on lie detection performance , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Cbema Computer,et al.  Guide to the draft American national standard for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations , 1985 .

[13]  John G. Beerends,et al.  The Influence of Video Quality on Perceived Audio Quality and Vice Versa , 1999 .

[14]  N. Chuberre,et al.  Satellite Digital Multimedia Broadcasting ( SDMB ) system presentation , 2005 .

[15]  Carol Bergfeld,et al.  Reading text from computer screens , 1987, CSUR.

[16]  Caj Södergård,et al.  Mobile television - technology and user experiences: Report on the Mobile-TV project , 2003 .

[17]  Richard Weiner.  Webster's New World dictionary of media and communications , 1990 .

[18]  Hendrik Knoche,et al.  Design requirements for mobile TV , 2005, Mobile HCI.