DELETERIOUS ALLELES AND DIFFERENTIAL VIABILITY IN PROGENY OF NATURAL HEMICLONAL FROGS

Abstract Spontaneous deleterious mutations are expected to accumulate through Muller's ratchet in clonally reproducing organisms and may lead to their extinction. We study deleterious mutations and their effects in a system of European frogs. Rana esculenta (RL), natural hybrids R. ridibunda (RR) ×R. lessonae (LL), reproduce hemiclonally; both sexes exclude the L genome in the germ line and produce unrecombined R gametes; hybridity is restored each generation by matings of RL with coexisting LL. Different allozyme‐defined hybrid hemiclones (R genome haplotypes) are thought to have originated independently from primary hybridizations RR × LL. Natural matings between two hybrids usually lead to inviable RR tadpoles. This inviability is thought to result from unmasked deleterious alleles on the clonally transmitted R genomes. Most simply it reflects homozygosity for recessive deleterious alleles at particular loci; alternatively (consistent with absence of RR adults in multiclonal populations) it may reflect hemiclone‐specific sets of incompletely recessive deleterious mutations that cumulatively cause inviability when two such genomes are combined. If inviability results from the former, progeny of two hybrids of different hemiclones, whether allopatric or coexisting, should be viable, because it is improbable that their R genomes share recessive deleterious alleles at the same set of loci; if inviability results from the latter, progeny of hybrids of different hemiclones should be inviable, especially when hybrid lineages are old. We tested these hypotheses in artificial crosses, using frogs from three regions: hemiclonal hybrids outside R. ridibunda's range from northern Switzerland (two abundant coexisting allozyme‐defined hemiclones; estimated lineage age 5000 generations) and from Sicily, Italy (one hemiclone; estimated age >25,000 generations) and R. ridibunda from Poland. We generated RR progeny, which we reared under benign conditions in the laboratory, by crossing (1) two hybrids from the same region (H × H local); (2) two hybrids from different regions (H × H foreign); (3) hybrids and R. ridibunda (H × R); and (4) two R. ridibunda (R × R). Survival to metamorphosis was similar and high for R × R, H × H foreign, and H × R, whereas all tadpoles of H × H local died before metamorphosis. This supports the hypothesis that homozygosity for recessive deleterious mutations at particular loci causes inviability. Crosses within and between the two coexisting hemiclones from Switzerland were, however, equally inviable. This result may reflect episodic sexual recombination in RR progeny from exceptional successful interclonal hybrid × hybrid matings, followed by matings of such RR with LL. This process would both slow down or halt Muller's ratchet and disrupt genetic independence of coexisting hemiclones, so that the same remaining deleterious R alleles could exist in different allozyme‐defined hemiclones. Whereas all data are consistent with the prediction of Muller's ratchet operating on clonally transmitted R genomes of natural hybrid lineages, they are insufficient to demonstrate such operation, because deleterious recessives that mutated after clone formation and those that preexisted in the R. ridibunda source populations that formed the hemiclonal lineages are not distinguished. The possibility of episodic sexual recombination must be carefully taken into account when studying Muller's ratchet in natural populations of this Rana system.

[1]  A. Kondrashov Measuring spontaneous deleterious mutation process , 2004, Genetica.

[2]  L. Hurst,et al.  Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  J. Travis VARIATION IN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS OF LARVAL ANURANS IN TEMPORARY PONDS. I. PERSISTENT VARIATION WITHIN A HYLA GRATIOSA POPULATION , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  A. Kondrashov Sex and U. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[6]  C Vorburger FIXATION OF DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS IN CLONAL LINEAGES: EVIDENCE FROM HYBRIDOGENETIC FROGS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  FIXATION OF CLONAL LINEAGES UNDER MULLER'S RATCHET , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  D. E. Gill,et al.  Interpreting Geographic Variation in Life-History Traits , 1983 .

[9]  R. Lande RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  E. Mayr,et al.  Modes of Speciation , 1978, How and Why Species Multiply.

[11]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[12]  T. Uzzell,et al.  Electrophoretic and Morphological Evidence for Two Forms of Green Frogs (Rana esculenta Complex) in Peninsular Italy (Amphibia, Salientia) , 1979 .

[13]  J. Crow,et al.  Advantages of sexual reproduction. , 1994, Developmental genetics.

[14]  P. Pamilo,et al.  Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. , 1987, Genetical research.

[15]  P. Beerli,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA reveals formation of nonhybrid frogs by natural matings between hemiclonal hybrids. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  M. Ragghianti,et al.  Rana ridibunda varies geographically in inducing clonal gametogenesis in interspecies hybrids , 1985 .

[17]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[18]  J. Bogart,et al.  Evolution and Ecology of Unisexual Vertebrates , 1989 .

[19]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF TADPOLES FROM THE HYBRIDOGENETIC RANA ESCULENTA COMPLEX: INTERACTIONS WITH POND DRYING AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  K. Gosner,et al.  A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification , 1960 .

[21]  M. Lynch,et al.  The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[22]  H. Tunner The Inheritance of Morphology and Electrophoretic Markers from Homotypic Crosses of the HybridogeneticRana esculenta , 1979 .

[23]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Clonal diversity and hybrid frequency are not correlated in water frogs. Is the frozen niche variation model wrong , 1994 .

[24]  B. R. Schmidt Are hybridogenetic frogs cyclical parthenogens? , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[26]  C. Vorburger Non‐hybrid offspring from matings between hemiclonal hybrid waterfrogs suggest occasional recombination between clonal genomes , 2001 .

[27]  P. Keightley,et al.  Response to Kondrashov. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Microsatellites: A tool for evolutionary genetic studies of western Palearctic water frogs , 2001 .

[29]  M. Rybacki,et al.  Artificial fertilization of water frogs , 1994 .

[30]  R. esculenta Genetic compatibility between sexual and clonal genomes in local populations of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex , 2022 .

[31]  R. Ladle,et al.  Covert sex. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  G. Bell Recombination and the immortality of the germ line , 1988 .

[33]  M. Nei Accumulation of Nonfunctional Genes on Sheltered Chromosomes , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[34]  R. Lande Risk of population extinction from fixation of deleterious and reverse mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[35]  Read,et al.  A pluralist approach to sex and recombination , 1999 .

[36]  C. Vorburger Heterozygous fitness effects of clonally transmitted genomes in waterfrogs , 2001 .

[37]  G. Nascetti,et al.  Hybrid zones between two genetically differentiated forms of the pond frog Rana lessonae in southern Italy , 1996 .

[38]  R. D. Semlitsch ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION IN MIXED POPULATIONS OF TADPOLES OF THE HYBRIDOGENETIC: RANA ESCULENTA COMPLEX , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  J. Felsenstein The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.

[40]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Spontaneous heterosis in larval life-history traits of hemiclonal frog hybrids. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  CONSIDERATION OF MULLER'S RATCHET MECHANISM THROUGH STUDIES OF GENETIC LINKAGE AND GENOMIC COMPATIBILITIES IN CLONALLY REPRODUCING POECILIOPSIS , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  L. Berger,et al.  Linkage groups of protein-coding genes in western palearctic water frogs reveal extensive evolutionary conservation. , 1997, Genetics.

[43]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  COMPETITION AMONG TADPOLES OF COEXISTING HEMICLONES OF HYBRIDOGENETIC RANA ESCULENTA: SUPPORT FOR THE FROZEN NICHE VARIATION MODEL , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  M. Lynch,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  D. Pfennig,et al.  Environmental Causes of Correlations between Age and Size at Metamorphosis in Scaphiopus Multiplicatus , 1991 .

[46]  R. Green,et al.  IS A LITTLE BIT OF SEX AS GOOD AS A LOT , 1995 .

[47]  M. Lynch,et al.  MULLER'S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Mutation accumulation in finite outbreeding and inbreeding populations , 1993 .

[49]  L. Berger Systematics and Hybridization in the Rana Esculenta Complex , 1977 .

[50]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Rapid fixation of deleterious alleles can be caused by Muller's ratchet. , 1997, Genetical research.

[51]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[52]  M. Ogielska,et al.  Spontaneous haploid-triploid mosaicism in the progeny of a Rana kI. esculenta female and Rana lessonae males , 1994 .

[53]  D. H. Taylor,et al.  The Reproductive Biology of Amphibians , 1977, Springer US.

[54]  R. H.J.MULLE THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE , 2002 .