Outcome measures used in the smartphone applications for the management of low back pain: a systematic scoping review

PurposeSmartphone applications (SPApps) have become a key tool for the self-management of low back pain (LBP). However, the scientific evidence behind the outcome measures used in SPApps for LBP is never investigated before. Therefore, this systematic review firstly assess the quality of the free SPApps for LBP, secondly examines the outcome measures used and thirdly evaluates the outcome measures against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set classifications for LBP.MethodsA systematic scoping review was conducted in the iTunes and Google Play™ on-line stores for LBP SPApps which are free to download. These searches were conducted using keywords suggested by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. SPApps were screened and downloaded to assess the quality using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). SPApps using outcome measures were reviewed separately to evaluate whether their outcome measures represented any of the ICF components for LBP.ResultsThe overall quality of the apps has a mean MARS score of 2.5/5. Out of 74 apps reviewed, only four apps had outcome measures that could be linked to ICF components for LBP. Two of the four categories comprising the LBP core set were well represented.ConclusionThe overall quality of the SPApps for LBP is low. Only very few SPApps offer outcome measures to monitor their effectiveness in the management of LBP. There is very limited evidence to show that the outcome measures used in the apps represents all the four core sets of LBP criteria set by ICF.

[1]  David Feeny,et al.  Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  K. Refshauge,et al.  Effectiveness of self‐management of low back pain: Systematic review with meta‐analysis , 2012, Arthritis care & research.

[3]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[4]  R. Strobl,et al.  The ICF forms a useful framework for classifying individual patient goals in post-acute rehabilitation. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  S. Chatterji,et al.  Identification of the most common patient problems in patients with chronic conditions using the ICF checklist. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  Alan L Kaplan,et al.  Improving patient engagement in self-measured blood pressure monitoring using a mobile health technology , 2017, Health Information Science and Systems.

[7]  R. de la Vega,et al.  mHealth: A Strategic Field without a Solid Scientific Soul. A Systematic Review of Pain-Related Apps , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  A. Gray,et al.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK , 1999, Pain.

[10]  Alarcos Cieza,et al.  Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008 , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  R. C. L. Cuerda,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and apps: A systematic review of mobile applications ☆ , 2016 .

[12]  R. D. de Bie,et al.  ICF Core Sets for low back pain. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  M. Kuehnhausen,et al.  Trusting smartphone Apps? To install or not to install, that is the question , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[14]  Christina Tsangouri,et al.  An mHealth App for Self-Management of Chronic Lower Back Pain (Limbr): Pilot Study , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[15]  Ambarish Pandey,et al.  Smartphone Apps as a Source of Cancer Information: Changing Trends in Health Information-Seeking Behavior , 2012, Journal of Cancer Education.

[16]  R. C. L. Cuerda,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and apps: A systematic review of mobile applications. , 2015, Neurologia.

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[18]  Osman H Ahmed,et al.  Smartphone apps for the self-management of low back pain: A systematic review. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[19]  Robert Stanton,et al.  Validity and intra-rater reliability of MyJump app on iPhone 6s in jump performance. , 2017, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[20]  A. Cieza,et al.  Content validity of the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core set for low back pain from the perspective of physicians: a Delphi survey , 2013, Chronic illness.

[21]  K. Valdes,et al.  Linking ICF components to outcome measures for orthotic intervention for CMC OA: A systematic review. , 2016, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[22]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  NICE low back pain guidelines: opportunities and obstacles to change practice , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  Oksana Zelenko,et al.  Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[24]  Lyndal Trevena,et al.  A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[25]  R. Chou,et al.  2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group , 2015, Spine.

[26]  Margaret McCartney,et al.  How do we know whether medical apps work? , 2013, BMJ.

[27]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.