Small-Group, Computer-Assisted Tutoring to Improve Reading Outcomes for Struggling First and Second Graders

This study evaluated the relative effects of Tier II computer-assisted tutoring in small groups (Team Alphie) and one-to-one tutoring provided to struggling readers in 33 high-poverty Success for All (SFA) schools. In this year-long study, struggling readers in the Team Alphie schools were tutored in groups of 6. In the control schools, students were tutored using the standard one-to-one tutoring process used in SFA. Analyses of covariance of students' standardized reading scores indicated that the first-grade treatment group significantly outperformed the control group on all 3 reading measures, with no significant differences for second graders. Schools using Team Alphie were able to tutor many more students than the control schools. This study shows that a computer-assisted, small-group tutoring program may be at least as effective as one-to-one tutoring and serve more struggling readers. It may serve as a good example of Tier II instruction in a response to intervention (RTI) model.

[1]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  One Million Children: Success for All , 2000 .

[2]  Patricia G. Mathes,et al.  The Effects of Peer-Assisted Literacy Strategies for First-Grade Readers With and Without Additional Mini-Skills Lessons , 2001 .

[3]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?. , 2006 .

[4]  2 Million children: Success for all (2nd ed.). , 2009 .

[5]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 2009 .

[6]  Stephanie Al Otaiba,et al.  Improving Reading Skills in Predominantly Hispanic Title 1 First–Grade Classrooms: The Promise of Peer–Assisted Learning Strategies , 2006 .

[7]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The essential handbook of memory disorders for clinicians , 2004 .

[8]  Geoffrey D. Borman,et al.  Comprehensive School Reform and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[9]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Reading Rescue: An Effective Tutoring Intervention Model for Language-Minority Students Who Are Struggling Readers in First Grade , 2007 .

[10]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Computer-Assisted Tutoring in Success for All: Reading Outcomes for First Graders , 2008 .

[11]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Technology Infusion in Success for All: Reading Outcomes for First Graders , 2008, The Elementary School Journal.

[12]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Beginning Reading Programs: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 2009 .

[13]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[14]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity , 1997 .

[15]  Anne Wade,et al.  The Learning Toolkit: The Design, Development, Testing and Dissemination of Evidence-based Educational Software 1 , 2010 .

[16]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Field replication of classwide peer tutoring. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  Kristi L. Santi,et al.  A Comparison of Teacher-Directed versus Peer-Assisted Instruction to Struggling First-Grade Readers , 2003, The Elementary School Journal.

[18]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for First-Grade Readers: Responding to the Needs of Diverse Learners. , 1998 .

[19]  Geoffrey D. Borman,et al.  Final Reading Outcomes of the National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All , 2007 .

[20]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[21]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Woodcock‐Johnson III Tests of Achievement , 2008 .

[23]  Diane Wilcox,et al.  Design and Implementation of Educational Games: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives , 2010 .

[24]  Barbara J. Wendling,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. , 2009 .

[25]  A. Bus,et al.  The Promise of Multimedia Stories for Kindergarten Children At Risk , 2006 .

[26]  Roberto Agodini,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings From Two Student Cohorts. NCEE 2009-4041. , 2009 .

[27]  Nancy A. Madden,et al.  Effective Programs for Struggling Readers: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 2009 .

[28]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the ABRACADABRA Reading Intervention Program in Grade 1. , 2009 .

[29]  R. Mayer.  Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[30]  Stephanie Al Otaiba,et al.  Effects of a Peer-Mediated Program on Reading Skill Acquisition for Two-Way Bilingual First-Grade Classrooms , 2007 .

[31]  Darrell Morris,et al.  Intervention after Grade 1: Serving Increased Numbers of Struggling Readers Effectively , 2005 .

[32]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort , 2007 .

[33]  A. Collins.  The Psychology of Memory. , 2001 .

[34]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Children's Learning in a Digital World , 2007 .

[35]  P. Klein,et al.  The use of computers in kindergarten, with or without adult mediation; effects on children's cognitive performance and behavior , 2000 .

[36]  Shirley V. Dickson,et al.  Reading Instruction Grouping for Students with Reading Difficulties , 2003 .

[37]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Developing a Computer-Assisted Tutoring Program to Help Children at Risk Learn to Read , 2001 .

[38]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Using Technology to Assist Children Learning to Read and Write , 2008 .

[39]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Achievement effects of embedded multimedia in a Success for All reading program , 2005 .

[40]  Gloria Gery.  Achieving Performance and Learning through Performance-Centered Systems , 2002 .

[41]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .