A framework to find the logic backbone of a biological network

BackgroundCellular behaviors are governed by interaction networks among biomolecules, for example gene regulatory and signal transduction networks. An often used dynamic modeling framework for these networks, Boolean modeling, can obtain their attractors (which correspond to cell types and behaviors) and their trajectories from an initial state (e.g. a resting state) to the attractors, for example in response to an external signal. The existing methods however do not elucidate the causal relationships between distant nodes in the network.ResultsIn this work, we propose a simple logic framework, based on categorizing causal relationships as sufficient or necessary, as a complement to Boolean networks. We identify and explore the properties of complex subnetworks that are distillable into a single logic relationship. We also identify cyclic subnetworks that ensure the stabilization of the state of participating nodes regardless of the rest of the network. We identify the logic backbone of biomolecular networks, consisting of external signals, self-sustaining cyclic subnetworks (stable motifs), and output nodes. Furthermore, we use the logic framework to identify crucial nodes whose override can drive the system from one steady state to another. We apply these techniques to two biological networks: the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition network corresponding to a developmental process exploited in tumor invasion, and the network of abscisic acid induced stomatal closure in plants. We find interesting subnetworks with logical implications in these networks. Using these subgraphs and motifs, we efficiently reduce both networks to succinct backbone structures.ConclusionsThe logic representation identifies the causal relationships between distant nodes and subnetworks. This knowledge can form the basis of network control or used in the reverse engineering of networks.

[1]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  C. Espinosa-Soto,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Cell-Fate Determination during Arabidopsis thaliana Flower Development That Is Robust and Recovers Experimental Gene Expression Profilesw⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[3]  H. Clevers,et al.  Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer , 2005, Nature.

[4]  M. Nieto,et al.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: the importance of changing cell state in development and disease. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Less Is More in Modeling Large Genetic Networks , 2005, Science.

[6]  R. Laubenbacher,et al.  Boolean Monomial Dynamical Systems , 2004, math/0403166.

[7]  I Jolanda M de Vries,et al.  Regulation of MYCN expression in human neuroblastoma cells , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[8]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  Integer Programming-Based Approach to Attractor Detection and Control of Boolean Networks , 2012, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Riccardo Dondi,et al.  Inferring (Biological) Signal Transduction Networks via Transitive Reductions of Directed Graphs , 2008, Algorithmica.

[10]  J. Aster,et al.  Notch Signaling in Cancer , 2002, Cancer biology & therapy.

[11]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Réka Albert,et al.  An effective network reduction approach to find the dynamical repertoire of discrete dynamic networks. , 2013, Chaos.

[13]  Jorge Gómez Tejeda Zañudo Network-based dynamic modeling and control strategies in complex diseases , 2016 .

[14]  R. Albert,et al.  Network model of survival signaling in large granular lymphocyte leukemia , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Quantitative modeling in cell biology: what is it good for? , 2006, Developmental cell.

[16]  M. Ng,et al.  Control of Boolean networks: hardness results and algorithms for tree structured networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  M. Margaliot Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks , 2012 .

[18]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  Spermine Oxidase SMO(PAOh1), Not N1-Acetylpolyamine Oxidase PAO, Is the Primary Source of Cytotoxic H2O2 in Polyamine Analogue-treated Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  M. Roelfsema,et al.  Closing gaps: linking elements that control stomatal movement. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[20]  David Hogg,et al.  Mutations in SUFU predispose to medulloblastoma , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Kathy Chen,et al.  Network dynamics and cell physiology , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  R. Albert,et al.  Discrete dynamic modeling of cellular signaling networks. , 2009, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  B. Bonavida,et al.  Mechanisms of nitric oxide-mediated inhibition of EMT in cancer , 2010, Cell cycle.

[24]  Gregory W. Carter,et al.  Inferring network interactions within a cell , 2005, Briefings Bioinform..

[25]  H. Friess,et al.  Transforming growth factor betas and their signaling receptors in human hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[26]  Byeong Wook Jeon,et al.  A new discrete dynamic model of ABA-induced stomatal closure predicts key feedback loops , 2017, PLoS biology.

[27]  Riccardo Dondi,et al.  A Novel Method for Signal Transduction Network Inference from Indirect Experimental Evidence , 2007, WABI.

[28]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  Guojun Sheng,et al.  Epithelial to mesenchymal transition during gastrulation: An embryological view , 2008, Development, growth & differentiation.

[30]  S. Weiss,et al.  A Wnt–Axin2–GSK3β cascade regulates Snail1 activity in breast cancer cells , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  R. Albert,et al.  Signaling Networks: Asynchronous Boolean Models , 2015 .

[32]  Mark A. Miller,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Guard Cell Abscisic Acid Signaling , 2006 .

[33]  E. Dahl,et al.  Expression of the glioma-associated oncogene homolog (GLI) 1 in human breast cancer is associated with unfavourable overall survival , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[34]  D. Barford,et al.  Mechanism of Activation of the RAF-ERK Signaling Pathway by Oncogenic Mutations of B-RAF , 2004, Cell.

[35]  Peter J. Keller,et al.  Metastasis suppressor gene Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) is a novel prognostic marker in prostate cancer , 2006, The Prostate.

[36]  Reka Albert,et al.  Network modeling of TGFβ signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition reveals joint sonic hedgehog and Wnt pathway activation. , 2014, Cancer research.

[37]  Réka Albert,et al.  Cell Fate Reprogramming by Control of Intracellular Network Dynamics , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Abdul Salam Jarrah,et al.  A Mathematical Framework for Agent Based Models of Complex Biological Networks , 2010, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[39]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  H. Kirikoshi,et al.  Up-regulation of Frizzled-7 (FZD7) in human gastric cancer. , 2001, International journal of oncology.

[41]  Song Li,et al.  Boolean network simulations for life scientists , 2008, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[42]  Daizhan Cheng,et al.  Controllability and observability of Boolean control networks , 2009, Autom..

[43]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer , 2002, Nature.

[44]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Qualitative modelling of regulated metabolic pathways: application to the tryptophan biosynthesis in E.Coli , 2005, ECCB/JBI.

[45]  J. Schroeder,et al.  Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[46]  James R Faeder,et al.  The Duration of T Cell Stimulation Is a Critical Determinant of Cell Fate and Plasticity , 2013, Science Signaling.

[47]  M. Emi,et al.  Amplification, up‐regulation and over‐expression of DVL‐1, the human counterpart of the Drosophila disheveled gene, in primary breast cancers , 2003, Cancer science.

[48]  Anna Amtmann,et al.  OnGuard, a Computational Platform for Quantitative Kinetic Modeling of Guard Cell Physiology1[W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.