The impact of tumor location on prognosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

PURPOSE We assessed the impact of traditional prognostic factors and tumor location on the survival of patients treated for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data on 86 patients with upper tract TCC who underwent nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff (95%) or parenchymal sparing surgery (5%). Mean patient age was 59.5 years and median followup was 43.8 months. The influence of traditional prognostic factors such as age, gender, tumor stage, grade and location on 5-year disease specific and recurrence-free (local recurrence or distant metastasis) survival rates was analyzed. The difference in survival rates between renal 45 pelvis and 41 ureteral cases was analyzed according to the respective T stage and grade. RESULTS Overall 5-year disease specific and recurrence-free survival rates were 83% and 72%, respectively. The significant prognostic factors for survival rates by univariate analysis were T stage, grade and location. N stage was significant for 5-year recurrence-free survival. On multivariate analysis tumor location was the only independent prognostic factor for the 2 survival rates, while N stage was significant for 5-year recurrence-free survival. Patients with ureteral tumor had a worse prognosis than those with pelvis tumor at the same stage or grade (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS Pelvis and ureteral TCC are not the same disease in terms of invasion and prognosis. Ureteral TCC is associated with a higher local or distant failure rate than renal pelvis TCC. A radical surgical approach including meticulous lymphadenectomy may be therapeutic in patients with invasive ureteral TCC.

[1]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Prognostic factors in urothelial renal pelvis and ureter tumours: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[2]  T. Carmody,et al.  Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. , 1998, Urology.

[3]  H. Miyake,et al.  The significance of lymphadenectomy in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[4]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1998 , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  S. Kubodera,et al.  The role of lymphadenectomy in the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[6]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  2099 Prognostic factors in urothelial renal pelvis and ureter tumors: A multicenter Rare Cancer Network study , 1997 .

[7]  T. Tzai,et al.  Prognostic factors of primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. , 1996, European urology.

[8]  S. Smalley,et al.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter: patterns of failure. , 1995, Urology.

[9]  J. Chmiel,et al.  Renal pelvic cancer: a review of 611 patients treated in Illinois 1975-1985. Cancer Incidence and End Results Committee. , 1992, Urology.

[10]  F. Bertoni,et al.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: evaluation of prognostic factors by histopathology and flow cytometric analysis. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[11]  B. Rye,et al.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: prognostic variables and post-operative recurrences. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[12]  C. Fowler,et al.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[13]  R. Huben,et al.  Tumor grade and stage as prognostic variables in upper tract urothelial tumors , 1988, Cancer.

[14]  N. Heney,et al.  Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the ureter. , 1981, The Journal of urology.

[15]  H. Zincke,et al.  Primary grade 1 transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. , 1980, The Journal of urology.

[16]  H. Grabstald,et al.  Upper urinary tract urothelial tumors. , 1976, The Urologic clinics of North America.