Web-Based Text Structure Strategy Instruction Improves Seventh Graders’ Content Area Reading Comprehension

Reading comprehension in the content areas is a challenge for many middle grade students. Text structure-based instruction has yielded positive outcomes in reading comprehension at all grade levels in small and large studies. The text structure strategy delivered via the web, called Intelligent Tutoring System for the Text Structure Strategy (ITSS), has proven successful in large-scale studies at 4th and 5th grades and a smaller study at 7th grade. Text structure-based instruction focuses on selection and encoding of strategic memory. This strategic memory proves to be an effective springboard for many comprehension-based activities such as summarizing, inferring, elaborating, and applying. This was the first large-scale randomized controlled efficacy study on the web-based delivery of the text structure strategy to 7th-grade students. 108 classrooms from rural and suburban schools were randomly assigned to ITSS or control and pretests and posttests were administered at the beginning and end of the school year. Multilevel data analyses were conducted on standardized and researcher designed measures of reading comprehension. Results showed that ITSS classrooms outperformed the control classrooms on all measures with the highest effects reported for number of ideas included in the main idea. Results have practical implications for classroom practices.

[1]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Examining Intelligent Tutoring of Structure Strategy for Fifth-Grade Readers , 2014 .

[2]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students With Disabilities Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading , 2006 .

[3]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  The Impact of a Strategy-Based Intervention on the Comprehension and Strategy Use of Struggling Adolescent Readers. , 2010 .

[4]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[5]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[6]  P. van den Broek,et al.  A cognitive account of discourse understanding and discourse interpretation: The Landscape Model of reading , 2011 .

[7]  R. Allington.  Reading Intervention in the Middle Grades. , 2011 .

[8]  G.L.M. Schellings,et al.  Signaling task awareness in think-aloud protocols from students selecting relevant information from text , 2011 .

[9]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Web-Based Tutoring of the Structure Strategy With or Without Elaborated Feedback or Choice for Fifth- and Seventh-Grade Readers , 2010 .

[10]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Higher Order Instructional Goals in Secondary Schools: Class, Teacher, and School Influences , 1993 .

[11]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  The Real-World Reading and Writing U.S. Children Need , 2010 .

[12]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  The Path to Competence: A Lifespan Developmental Perspective on Reading , 2005 .

[13]  S. Vaughn,et al.  A Synthesis of Reading Interventions and Effects on Reading Comprehension Outcomes for Older Struggling Readers , 2009, Review of educational research.

[14]  Dariush Hooshmand.  The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Reading English as a Foreign Language (Iran) , 1984 .

[15]  Catherine M. Bohn-Gettler,et al.  The Interplay of Reader Goals, Working Memory, and Text Structure During Reading. , 2014, Contemporary educational psychology.

[16]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Children's reading comprehension and assessment , 2005 .

[17]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life: Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task , 1989 .

[18]  Eileen Kintsch,et al.  Summary Street: Interactive Computer Support for Writing , 2004 .

[19]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Reading for Meaning: Fostering Comprehension in the Middle Grades. Language and Literacy Series. , 1999 .

[20]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Children’s Use of Comparative Text Signals: The Relationship between Age and Comprehension Ability , 2012 .

[21]  D. McNamara.  SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training , 2004 .

[22]  E. Kintsch,et al.  Teaching Struggling Middle School Readers to Comprehend Informational Text , 2014, ICLS.

[23]  Sean F. Reardon,et al.  Patterns of Literacy among U.S. Students , 2013, The Future of children.

[24]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Improving Adolescent Students' Reading Comprehension with Istart , 2006 .

[25]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of Text. , 2001 .

[26]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Improving Content Knowledge and Comprehension for English Language Learners: Findings From a Randomized Control Trial , 2017 .

[27]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  High-fidelity implementation of web-based intelligent tutoring system improves fourth and fifth graders content area reading comprehension , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[28]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy , 2009 .

[29]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[30]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension , 2012 .

[31]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[32]  James F. Voss,et al.  Learning From History Text: The Interaction of Knowledge and Comprehension Skill with Text Structure , 1996 .

[33]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Discourse Type on Recall , 1984 .

[35]  D. Halpern.  Assessing Gender Gaps in Learning and Academic Achievement , 2006 .

[36]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Extending capacity-constrained construction integration: Toward "smarter" and flexible models of text comprehension , 1996 .

[37]  Phyllis S. Underwood,et al.  Testing the Impact of Child Characteristics × Instruction Interactions on Third Graders' Reading Comprehension by Differentiating Literacy Instruction. , 2011, Reading research quarterly.

[38]  J. Henry,et al.  Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Two Methods of Tinnitus Intervention to Two Control Conditions , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[39]  Jessica A. Brown,et al.  The Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Expository Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analysis , 2016 .

[40]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  MOTIVATING STRUGGLING READERS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL THROUGH AN ENGAGEMENT MODEL OF CLASSROOM PRACTICE , 2003 .

[41]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for Middle and High Schools: A Best‐Evidence Synthesis , 2008 .

[42]  C. Snow,et al.  Reading Next: A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy , 2004 .

[43]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Structure-Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. , 1995 .

[44]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Age differences in rereading , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Janis K. Jefferies.  Research based practices in Art and Design , 2012 .

[46]  L. Mason.  Explicit Self-Regulated Strategy Development Versus Reciprocal Questioning: Effects on Expository Reading Comprehension Among Struggling Readers. , 2004 .

[47]  Michael Pressley,et al.  What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of , 2000 .

[48]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension , 2008 .

[49]  R. Slavin,et al.  The Reading Edge: a randomized evaluation of a middle school cooperative reading program , 2009 .

[50]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Text Coherence and Readability , 2003 .

[51]  Kevin Wheldall.  When will we ever learn? , 2005 .