Errors in the bisulfite conversion of DNA: modulating inappropriate- and failed-conversion frequencies

Bisulfite treatment can be used to ascertain the methylation states of individual cytosines in DNA. Ideally, bisulfite treatment deaminates unmethylated cytosines to uracils, and leaves 5-methylcytosines unchanged. Two types of bisulfite-conversion error occur: inappropriate conversion of 5-methylcytosine to thymine, and failure to convert unmethylated cytosine to uracil. Conventional bisulfite treatment requires hours of exposure to low-molarity, low-temperature bisulfite (‘LowMT’) and, sometimes, thermal denaturation. An alternate, high-molarity, high-temperature (‘HighMT’) protocol has been reported to accelerate conversion and to reduce inappropriate conversion. We used molecular encoding to obtain validated, individual-molecule data on failed- and inappropriate-conversion frequencies for LowMT and HighMT treatments of both single-stranded and hairpin-linked oligonucleotides. After accounting for bisulfite-independent error, we found that: (i) inappropriate-conversion events accrue predominantly on molecules exposed to bisulfite after they have attained complete or near-complete conversion; (ii) the HighMT treatment is preferable because it yields greater homogeneity among sites and among molecules in conversion rates, and thus yields more reliable data; (iii) different durations of bisulfite treatment will yield data appropriate to address different experimental questions; and (iv) conversion errors can be used to assess the validity of methylation data collected without the benefit of molecular encoding.

[1]  R. Britten,et al.  Repeated Sequences in DNA , 1968 .

[2]  D. Barlow,et al.  Maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinting signal , 1993, Cell.

[3]  R. Hansen,et al.  Molecular barcodes detect redundancy and contamination in hairpin-bisulfite PCR. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  W. Brown,et al.  Epigenetic variation illustrated by DNA methylation patterns of the fragile-X gene FMR1. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  Lixin Qi,et al.  Both Hypomethylation and Hypermethylation in a 0.2-kb Region of a DNA Repeat in Cancer , 2005, Molecular Cancer Research.

[6]  R. Scott Hansen,et al.  Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: Assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  H. Hayatsu,et al.  High-speed conversion of cytosine to uracil in bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis of DNA methylation. , 2004, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[8]  Susan J. Clark,et al.  CpNpG methylation in mammalian cells , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[9]  S. Clark,et al.  Cytosines adjacent to methylated CpG sites can be partially resistant to conversion in genomic bisulfite sequencing leading to methylation artifacts. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  A. Feinberg,et al.  Alterations in DNA methylation in human colon neoplasia. , 1987, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[11]  L. E. McDonald,et al.  A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  A population-epigenetic model to infer site-specific methylation rates from double-stranded DNA methylation patterns. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Barlow,et al.  Maternal-specific methylation of the imprinted mouse Igf2r locus identifies the expressed locus as carrying the imprinting signal. , 1993, Cell.

[14]  A. Bird,et al.  Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Christoph Grunau,et al.  Identification and resolution of artifacts in bisulfite sequencing. , 2002, Methods.

[16]  H. Hayatsu,et al.  Does urea promote the bisulfite-mediated deamination of cytosine in DNA? Investigation aiming at speeding-up the procedure for DNA methylation analysis. , 2006, Nucleic acids symposium series.

[17]  S. Clark,et al.  High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  R. Teoule,et al.  The final deprotection step in oligonucleotide synthesis is reduced to a mild and rapid ammonia treatment by using labile base-protecting groups. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  D. Ginty,et al.  Hypermethylated SUPERMAN Epigenetic Alleles in Arabidopsis , 1997 .

[20]  R. Stöger.  In Vivo Methylation Patterns of the Leptin Promoter in Human and Mouse , 2006, Epigenetics.

[21]  Pilar Cubas,et al.  An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in ̄ oral symmetry , 2022 .

[22]  P. Laplace.  A Philosophical Essay On Probabilities , 1902 .

[23]  P. Leder,et al.  Parental legacy determines methylation and expression of an autosomal transgene: A molecular mechanism for parental imprinting , 1987, Cell.

[24]  Adrian Bird,et al.  The essentials of DNA methylation , 1992, Cell.

[25]  Christoph Grunau,et al.  Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  Identification of DNMT1 (DNA methyltransferase 1) hypomorphs in somatic knockouts suggests an essential role for DNMT1 in cell survival , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  G. Karpen,et al.  Fragile sites in human chromosomes as regions of late-replicating DNA , 1987 .