Bandwidth management in wireless sensor networks.

Wireless sensor networks are often used in monitoring and control applications, where software running on generalpurpose computers “pull” information from remote sensors and “push” actuations into the network. The sensors themselves form a multihop wireless network communicatingwith one or more sensor access points (SAPs) that interface between application software and the sensor network. This paper addresses the problem of managing wireless network bandwidth and improving network capacity in a sensor network deployed as a shared infrastructure, concurrently used by different applications. Our bandwidth management architecture incorporates three ideas: first, we develop a simple rule system that allows applications and the network administrator to specify how traffic generated by sensors should be treated by the sensor network. Each rule is a function that maps a sensor data type and generated value to a transmission rate and a traffic class. Second, we show how using multiple SAPs and SAP selection method that considers packet loss probabilities, path load, and path lengths improves the capacity of the network and the performance of individual sensor streams. Third, we show that hopby-hop flow control, rather than end-to-end congestion control, is a better way to cope with the nature of sensor network traffic and avoids unnecessary packet losses that waste valuable wireless network bandwidth. Our experimental results from a 40-node indoor wireless sensor testbed show that these three techniques are simple to implement and allow scarce network bandwidth to be used efficiently.

[1]  David E. Culler,et al.  A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[2]  Xuanming Dong,et al.  FLORAX-flow-rate based hop by hop backpressure control for IEEE 802.3x , 2002, 5th IEEE International Conference on High Speed Networks and Multimedia Communication (Cat. No.02EX612).

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[4]  Robert Szewczyk,et al.  System architecture directions for networked sensors , 2000, ASPLOS IX.

[5]  Mark D. Yarvis,et al.  Real-world experiences with an interactive ad hoc sensor network , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshop.

[6]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Challenges to reliable data transport over heterogeneous wireless networks , 1998 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[8]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[9]  Wendi B. Heinzelman,et al.  Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[11]  Partho Pratim Mishra,et al.  A hop by hop rate-based congestion control scheme , 1992, SIGCOMM 1992.

[12]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[13]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  An integrated congestion management architecture for Internet hosts , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[14]  George Varghese,et al.  Reliable and efficient hop-by-hop flow control , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.

[15]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Capacity of Ad Hoc wireless networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[16]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Performance of multihop wireless networks: shortest path is not enough , 2003, CCRV.

[17]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.