Neural Sampling Strategies for Visual Stimulus Reconstruction fromTwo-photon Imaging of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Deciphering the neural code involves interpreting the responses of sensory neurons from the perspective of a downstream population. Performing such a read-out is an important step towards understanding how the brain processes sensory information and has implications for Brain-Machine Interfaces. While previous work has focused on classification algorithms to identify a stimulus in a predefined set of categories, few studies have approached a full-stimulus reconstruction task, especially from calcium imaging recordings. Here, we attempt a pixel-by-pixel reconstruction of complex natural stimuli from two-photon calcium imaging of mouse primary visual cortex. We decoded the activity of 103 neurons from layer 2/3 using an optimal linear estimator and investigated which factors drive the reconstruction performance at the pixel level. We find the density of receptive fields to be the most influential feature. Finally, we use the receptive field data and simulations from a linear-nonlinear Poisson model to extrapolate decoding accuracy as a function of network size. We find that, on this dataset, reconstruction performance can increase by more than 50%, provided that the receptive fields are sampled more uniformly in the full visual field. These results provide practical experimental guidelines to boost the accuracy of full-stimulus reconstruction.

[1]  Georg Martius,et al.  Nonlinear decoding of a complex movie from the mammalian retina , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Kenichi Ohki,et al.  Robust representation of natural images by sparse and variable population of active neurons in visual cortex , 2018 .

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  High Accuracy Decoding of Dynamical Motion from a Large Retinal Population , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  C. Niell,et al.  What can mice tell us about how vision works? , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Population code in mouse V1 facilitates read-out of natural scenes through increased sparseness , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Ryan J. Prenger,et al.  Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity , 2009, Neuron.

[7]  James A. Bednar,et al.  Model Constrained by Visual Hierarchy Improves Prediction of Neural Responses to Natural Scenes , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  B. Willmore,et al.  Neural Representation of Natural Images in Visual Area V2 , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Kenichi Ohki,et al.  Representation of natural image contents by sparsely active neurons in visual cortex , 2018 .

[10]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Fast nonnegative deconvolution for spike train inference from population calcium imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Neural Networks for Efficient Bayesian Decoding of Natural Images from Retinal Neurons , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[13]  C. Stosiek,et al.  In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[15]  G B Stanley,et al.  Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.