Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.

This study investigates the margin quality of four different tooth-coloured inlay systems using computer-aided quantitative margin analysis under scanning electron microscopy. Three types of restorations involved chairside procedures using a commercial CAD-CAM apparatus: one type of inlay restoration was milled from preformed glass ceramic blocks, the other two inlay types were milled from preformed porcelain blocks. The fourth system was based on an experimental indirect composite inlay system. Each inlay type was luted with its respective dual-curing luting composite, which was supplied with the system. After 6 months of clinical service, all four systems revealed a significant percentage of submargination indicating occlusal wear of the luting composite. The porcelain inlays and the composite inlays luted with their respective experimental luting composite showed the best marginal adaptation. Luted glass ceramic inlays, in particular, suffered from a significantly higher percentage of inlay margin fractures (9 per cent) and marginal openings (4 per cent) than the other systems. A possible explanation is that the glass ceramic subsurface structure at the inlay-lute interface was weakened by etching with ammonium bifluoride.

[1]  G. Willems,et al.  Dual-cure luting composites: Part I: Filler particle distribution. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  W. Douglas,et al.  The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. , 1989, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Trends in the selection of dental filling materials. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  R. C. Caldwell,et al.  Microhardness Studies of Intact Surface Enamel , 1957, Journal of dental research.

[5]  J. Roulet Degradation of Dental Polymers , 1986 .

[6]  J. Roulet A materials scientist's view: assessment of wear and marginal integrity. , 1987, Quintessence international.

[7]  Grossman Dg Cast glass ceramics. , 1985 .

[8]  G. Vanherle,et al.  International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials , 1985 .

[9]  F Barbakow,et al.  CAD-CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: a case report after 3 years in place. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. , 1989, Quintessence international.

[11]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  J. Roulet,et al.  Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[14]  F. Lutz,et al.  Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restoration. , 1977, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  J F Roulet,et al.  Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. , 1989, Scanning microscopy.

[16]  H. Harnisch [A long lasting anesthetic for dental practice]. , 1967, Die Quintessenz.

[17]  H. Hosoda,et al.  A varnish to prevent etching unrestored enamel. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  M. Bergman Side-effects of amalgam and its alternatives: local, systemic and environmental. , 1990, International dental journal.