Outlining and categorising mammographic breast density: expert radiologist perception

The main aim of this study is to investigate the outlining and categorising of mammographic breast density by expert radiologists in order to help to understand what kind of region radiologists perceive as breast density and how they assess the density of a mammogram. It investigates inter-radiologist variability in breast density outlining and assessment. Forty-five normal cranio-caudal view mammograms with a range of appearances of breast density were presented to twenty radiologists. Each participant was asked to manually outline any mammographic breast density using an interactive pen tablet and to visually classify mammographic breast density in two ways by using the BI-RADS density categorization system by the American College of Radiology, and by estimating the percentage of area of mammographic breast density. Large differences were found in breast density outlining for all BI-RADS density categories. Scattered and patchy breast density appeared to be associated with large variation in outlining. There was moderate inter-radiologist agreement in BI-RADS density categorising (Kappa = 0.489). Breast density is a complex radiological feature that impacts upon assessment consistency.

[1]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[3]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. , 2005, Breast.

[4]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[6]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[9]  Alberto Tagliafico,et al.  Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one. , 2009, Breast.

[10]  Jiang Li-min Nonpalpable breast lesions categorization by breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) , 2005 .

[11]  Pierre-Edouard Sottas,et al.  Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[12]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. , 2006, Radiology.