THD and mucopexy: Efficacy and controversy
暂无分享,去创建一个
K. Khan | A. Ugwu | A. Hammad | H. Abudeeb | Jamshid Darabnia | Min Maung | A. Mukherjee | A. Khan | Elizabeth McNulty
[1] Steven R. Brown,et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.
[2] T. Bisgaard,et al. Limited success in patients treated with transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation. , 2014, Danish medical journal.
[3] G. Gravante,et al. Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes , 2011, Techniques in Coloproctology.
[4] G. Gravante,et al. Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization: A Systematic Review , 2009, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
[5] R. Phillips,et al. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease , 2007, Techniques in Coloproctology.
[6] T. Ikeda,et al. A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. , 1995, The American journal of gastroenterology.