Speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images using an unbiased non-local means method

Abstract Enhancement of ultrasound (US) images is required for proper visual inspection and further pre-processing since US images are generally corrupted with speckle. In this paper, a new approach based on non-local means (NLM) method is proposed to remove the speckle noise in the US images. Since the interpolated final Cartesian image produced from uncompressed ultrasound data contaminated with fully developed speckle can be represented by a Gamma distribution, a Gamma model is incorporated in the proposed denoising procedure. In addition, the scale and shape parameters of the Gamma distribution are estimated using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Bias due to speckle noise is expressed using these parameters and is removed from the NLM filtered output. The experiments on phantom images and real 2D ultrasound datasets show that the proposed method outperforms other related well-accepted methods, both in terms of objective and subjective evaluations. The results demonstrate that the proposed method has a better performance in both speckle reduction and preservation of structural features.

[1]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  José V. Manjón,et al.  MRI denoising using Non-Local Means , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  J.B.T.M. Roerdink,et al.  A review of wavelet denoising in MRI and ultrasound brain imaging , 2006 .

[4]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Ultrasound Despeckling Using an Adaptive Window Stochastic Approach , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Y. Fisher Fractal image compression: theory and application , 1995 .

[7]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Restoration of 3D medical images with total variation scheme on wavelet domains (TVW) , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Multi-Scale Nonlinear Thresholding for Ultrasonic Speckle Suppression , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Jeny Rajan,et al.  Enhancement and bias removal of optical coherence tomography images: An iterative approach with adaptive bilateral filtering , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Rayleigh-Maximum-Likelihood Filtering for Speckle Reduction of Ultrasound Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Nonlocal Means-Based Speckle Filtering for Ultrasound Images , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  E. Nezry,et al.  Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity , 1990 .

[14]  Torbjørn Eltoft,et al.  Modeling the amplitude statistics of ultrasonic images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  M. Omair Ahmad,et al.  New Spatially Adaptive Wavelet-based Method for the Despeckling of Medical Ultrasound Images , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[16]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound Echo Envelope Analysis Using a Homodyned K Distribution Signal Model , 1994 .

[18]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[19]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A new method for IVUS-based coronary artery disease risk stratification: A link between coronary & carotid ultrasound plaque burdens , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[21]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[22]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Multiplicative Noise Removal Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Despeckle filtering software toolbox for ultrasound imaging of the common carotid artery , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  De-speckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[25]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[26]  S. Gupta,et al.  Locally adaptive wavelet domain Bayesian processor for denoising medical ultrasound images using Speckle modelling based on Rayleigh distribution , 2005 .

[27]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  A stochastic approach to ultrasound despeckling , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[28]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the influence of interpolation on probabilistic models for ultrasonic images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[29]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  Evaluation of Four Probability Distribution Models for Speckle in Clinical Cardiac Ultrasound Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  J S Suri,et al.  Automated and accurate carotid bulb detection, its verification and validation in low quality frozen frames and motion video. , 2014, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[32]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Betty Jones Whitten,et al.  Modified moment and maximum likelihood estimators for parameters of the three-parameter gamma distribution , 1982 .

[34]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation of intravascular ultrasound images: a knowledge-based approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[35]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Principal components transformation of multifrequency polarimetric SAR imagery , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[36]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[37]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Osama Zahran,et al.  Comparative Study of Different Denoising Filters for Speckle Noise Reduction in Ultrasonic B-Mode Images , 2013 .

[39]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[40]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[41]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  GyneScan: An Improved Online Paradigm for Screening of Ovarian Cancer via Tissue Characterization , 2014, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[42]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Probabilistic-Driven Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion with Application to Cardiac Ultrasonic Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[43]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound Imaging , 2008 .

[44]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  C.P. Loizou,et al.  Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.