Changing everyday activities of couples in late life: converging and keeping up.

The influence of mutual spousal interrelations in domains such as health and wellbeing has been demonstrated, but little is known about the domain of everyday activities of couples in late life. In the present explorative study, we considered all of the activities participating couples talked about to be their everyday activities. Its aim was to understand, over time, changes in everyday activities as experienced by late-life community-dwelling couples. In a two-year period, 41 individual and joint interviews were conducted with 8 couples, who were purposefully selected from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Analyses involved the construction of couple narratives and constant comparisons within and across couples. Changing everyday activities in late-life couples was interpreted to be a two-way process of (1) converging, and (2) keeping up, which occurred in three fluid phases. Converging was a slow inward movement with a shift towards diminished everyday activities performed in a smaller world. Keeping up was an outward movement in order to resist the converging process by using everyday activities as a means to keep fit, physically and mentally, and to connect with the wider social world. In the first phase, couples maintained their unique linked activity pattern. In the second phase, spouses resisted converging by keeping up. In the third phase, spouses co-performed everyday activities closely together. The findings support the need to develop couple-oriented interventions that aim to enhance the couples' functioning in the domain of everyday activities.

[1]  E. Cumming,et al.  Growing old : the process of disengagement , 1963 .

[2]  J. Genest,et al.  Clinical research. , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  K. Hammell.  Dimensions of Meaning in the Occupations of Daily Life , 2004, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[4]  A. Beekman,et al.  COHORT PROFILE Cohort Profile : The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam , 2011 .

[5]  F. Lang,et al.  Regulation of social relationships in later adulthood. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[6]  F. van Nes,et al.  One body, three hands and two minds: A case study of the intertwined occupations of an older couple after a stroke , 2009 .

[7]  P. Baltes,et al.  Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. , 1990 .

[8]  C. Christiansen,et al.  The 1999 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Defining lives: occupation as identity: an essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. , 1999, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  T. Abma,et al.  qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? , 2022 .

[10]  D. Gerstorf,et al.  Spousal social activity trajectories in the Australian longitudinal study of ageing in the context of cognitive, physical, and affective resources. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[11]  K. Adams,et al.  A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life , 2010, Ageing and Society.

[12]  K. Adams.  Changing Investment in Activities and Interests in Elders' Lives: Theory and Measurement , 2004, International journal of aging & human development.

[13]  M. Eklund,et al.  Occupational value and relationships to meaning and health: Elaborations of the ValMO-model , 2011, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[14]  T. Antonucci,et al.  Attachment and close relationships across the life span , 2004, Attachment & human development.

[15]  K. Gergen.  Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community , 2009 .

[16]  D. Gerstorf,et al.  Dyadic Interrelations in Lifespan Development and Aging: How Does 1 + 1 Make a Couple? – Introduction , 2010, Gerontology.

[17]  K. Charmaz,et al.  The Self as Habit: The Reconstruction of Self in Chronic Illness , 2002 .

[18]  D. Polkinghorne.  Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences , 2010 .

[19]  R. Atchley.  A continuity theory of normal aging. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[20]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[21]  D. Polkinghorne.  Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .

[22]  James A. Holstein,et al.  The active interview , 1995 .

[23]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  J. Kelly.  Activity and Aging: Staying Involved in Later Life , 1993 .

[25]  William L. Randall.  Narrative and Chaos Acknowledging the Novelty of Lives-in-Time , 2007 .

[26]  H. D. de Vocht,et al.  Interviewing Separately or as Couples? Considerations of Authenticity of Method , 2011, Qualitative health research.

[27]  M. Luszcz,et al.  The health and relationship dynamics of late-life couples: a systematic review of the literature , 2009, Ageing and Society.

[28]  R. Harwood,et al.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[29]  H. Keller,et al.  The food-related role shift experiences of spousal male care partners and their wives with dementia , 2011 .

[30]  J. Kiecolt-Glaser,et al.  Marriage and health: his and hers. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  C. Riessman.  Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences , 2007 .

[32]  B. Luo,et al.  Toward a discourse shift in social gerontology: From successful aging to harmonious aging , 2012 .

[33]  T. Parsons,et al.  Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement. , 1962 .

[34]  Brett Smith,et al.  Narrative analysis in aging studies: A typology for consideration , 2010 .

[35]  D. Deeg,et al.  Longitudinal characterization of course types of functional limitations , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[36]  Brett Smith,et al.  Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action , 2009 .

[37]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[38]  P. Wong,et al.  Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. , 1988 .

[39]  D. Jopp,et al.  Improvement/Maintenance and Reorientation as Central Features of Coping with Major Life Change and Loss: Contributions of Three Life-Span Theories , 2007, Human Development.

[40]  D. D. de Ridder,et al.  A review of successful aging models: proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy. , 2007, Clinical psychology review.

[41]  R. Atchley.  Continuity and Adaptation in Aging: Creating Positive Experiences , 1999 .

[42]  A. Stigsdotter-Neely,et al.  Engagement in activities , 2008 .

[43]  K. Knafl,et al.  Within-Case and Across-Case Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[44]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Uncertainty, Belongingness, and Four Needs for Meaning , 2009 .

[45]  James A. Holstein,et al.  The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World , 1999 .

[46]  F. Goldscheider,et al.  Spousal caregiving in late midlife versus older ages: implications of work and family obligations. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[47]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Physical activity intervention in older adults: does a participating partner make a difference? , 2011, European journal of ageing.

[48]  Mike Nolan,et al.  ‘We do things together’ , 2005 .

[49]  A. Beekman,et al.  Cohort Profile: The Longitudinal Aging Study , 2011 .

[50]  C. Berg,et al.  A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.