Beyond the concept: characterisations of later-stage creative behaviour in design

As a mechanism through which better solutions are developed, creativity is well-recognised as an important part of the engineering design process, but has to date largely only been studied in general or in early design process stages. This paper aims to study the occurrence of creative behaviour in engineering design with a particular focus on the later design process stages. Through the application of a detailed coding scheme to two studies of engineers’ work, this paper identifies patterns in creative behaviour through the design process stages, creative approaches employed by engineers, typical types of creative task, and fundamental differences within creative behaviour between early- and late-stage design. This understanding is then used to form ten characterisations of engineer behaviour within late-stage design, early-stage design, and throughout the design process. These characterisations can be used to direct future research and to improve the design process and output through development of specific, effective design support methods, selected to be appropriate to the design stage and type of creative behaviour that occurs within.

[1]  Philip Samuel,et al.  TOWARD AN ADAPTION-INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2011 .

[2]  Damien Motte,et al.  STUDY OF THE DESIGNER’S COGNITIVE PROCESSES DURING THE LATER PHASES OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS , 2004 .

[3]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[4]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[5]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in engineering design: Examining the effects of prior knowledge on creativity and ideation , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and creativity. , 1998 .

[7]  David C. Brown,et al.  The Curse of Creativity , 2010, DCC.

[8]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  DEFINING AND SUPPORTING DESIGN CREATIVITY , 2006 .

[9]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!) , 1996 .

[10]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Evolution of Commitments in the Design of a Component , 1992 .

[11]  T. Jong Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[12]  K. Klenke,et al.  Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership , 2016 .

[13]  Willemien Visser,et al.  The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing , 2006 .

[14]  Sven Matthiesen,et al.  SEVEN YEARS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN INDUSTRY – EXPERIENCES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPORTING ENGINEERING DESIGN WITH ‘THINKING TOOLS’ , 2011 .

[15]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  The appearance of creative behavior in later stage design processes , 2014 .

[16]  Scott G. Isaksen,et al.  Adaption-Innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The Level-Style Issue Revisited , 1988 .

[17]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[19]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[20]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. , 1997 .

[21]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity Support Tools: Report From a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process , 2013 .

[23]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[24]  David C. Brown ROUTINENESS REVISITED , 2022 .

[25]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[26]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[27]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  The elusive act of synthesis: creativity in the conceptual design of complex engineering products , 2009, C&C '09.

[28]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The psychological study of design , 1979 .

[29]  David C. Brown,et al.  Creativity, Surprise & Design: An Introduction and Investigation , 2012 .

[30]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[31]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Creative Imagery: Discoveries and inventions in Visualization , 1990 .

[32]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creative thinking by expert designers , 2004 .

[33]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Engineering Design, 4th edition , 2009 .

[34]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  The significance of co-evolving requirements and solutions in the design process , 1997 .

[35]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Representation in design: data from engineering journals , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[36]  T. Lubart Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[37]  Maria J. Stokes,et al.  Managing Engineering Knowledge: MOKA-Methodology for Knowledge Based Engineering Applications , 2001 .

[38]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1995, EWHCI.

[39]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[40]  Larry Leifer,et al.  Understanding Idealogging: The Use and Perception of Logbooks within a Capstone Engineering Design Course , 2009 .

[41]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[42]  Raymonde Guindon Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[43]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[44]  G. Bedny,et al.  The Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to the Study of Human Work , 2005 .

[45]  J. Gero Computational Models of Innovative and Creative Design Processes , 2000 .

[46]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[47]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli , 2013 .

[48]  Herbert Birkhofer,et al.  Imparting Design Methods With the Strategies of Experts , 2007 .

[49]  J. Hayes Cognitive Processes in Creativity , 1989 .

[50]  A. Cropley In Praise of Convergent Thinking , 2006 .

[51]  David C. Brown,et al.  Engineering Design: Representation and Reasoning , 2012 .

[52]  Robert Bjärnemo,et al.  The cognitive aspects of the engineering design activity – A literature survey , 2004 .

[53]  David Knott,et al.  The Place of TRIZ in a Holistic Design Methodology , 2001 .

[54]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[55]  Robert Bjärnemo,et al.  A DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF THE DESIGNER'S PROBLEM-SOLVING ACTIVITY DURING THE LATER PHASES OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS , 2011 .

[56]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The Integration of Systems Levels and Design Activities to Position Creativity Support Tools , 2009 .

[57]  J. Guilford The structure of intellect. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Organisation of Design Activities: Opportunistic, with Hierarchical Episodes , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[59]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[60]  Terri Gullickson The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. , 1995 .

[61]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[62]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[63]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  Opening and constraining: constraints and their role in creative processes , 2010, DESIRE.

[64]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[65]  Michael French,et al.  The opportunistic route and the role of design principles , 1992 .

[66]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity , 1998 .

[67]  Linda Candy,et al.  Supporting the creative user: a criteria-based approach to interaction design , 1997 .

[68]  Fehm Smulders,et al.  Modelling co-evolution in design practice , 2009 .

[69]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change as little as possible: creativity in design by modification , 2012 .

[70]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[71]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[72]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[73]  Gregory J. Feist Handbook of Creativity: The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity , 1998 .

[74]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice , 2013 .

[75]  J. Gero,et al.  DESIGN AND CHANGE: A MODEL OF SITUATED CREATIVITY , 2003, IJCAI 2003.

[76]  R. Helson,et al.  Creative potential, creative achievement, and personal growth. , 2000, Journal of personality.

[77]  M. Maher Co-evolutionary Design of Structural Layouts : A Potentially Creative Solution ? , 2022 .

[78]  B Bender,et al.  ON THE SUPERIORITY OF OPPORTUNISTIC DESIGN STRATEGIES DURING EARLY EMBODIMENT DESIGN , 2004 .

[79]  D. Scaravetti,et al.  Exploring design spaces in the search for embodiment design solutions and decision support , 2006, The Proceedings of the Multiconference on "Computational Engineering in Systems Applications".

[80]  Philip Cash,et al.  Investigating design: A comparison of manifest and latent approaches , 2014 .

[81]  W. Sauser,et al.  Creativity and Certain Personality Traits: Understanding the Mediating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation , 2008 .

[82]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[83]  Rüdiger Klein,et al.  Knowledge Modeling In Design - The MOKA Framework , 2000, AID.

[84]  Chris Snider,et al.  Characterising the Creative Behaviour of Designers within the Late-Stage Engineering Design Process , 2014 .

[85]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[86]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[87]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Representation of functions and features in detail design , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..

[88]  Geraint A. Wiggins Searching for computational creativity , 2006, New Generation Computing.

[89]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook , 2006 .

[90]  T. B. Ward Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[91]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Modeling design exploration as co-evolution , 1996 .

[92]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[93]  R. Eisentraut,et al.  Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process , 1997 .

[94]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[95]  Bob Eberle Scamper: Games for Imagination Development , 1984 .

[96]  M. Boden WHAT IS CREATIVITY , 2005 .

[97]  M. Kirton,et al.  Have Adaptors and Innovators Equal Levels of Creativity? , 1978 .

[98]  T. Lubart Handbook of Creativity: Creativity Across Cultures , 1998 .