Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study

Objective To model the overall and income specific effect of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks on the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the UK. Design Econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. Setting United Kingdom. Population Adults aged 16 and over. Intervention A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks. Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were the overall and income specific changes in the number and percentage of overweight (body mass index ≥25) and obese (≥30) adults in the UK following the implementation of the tax. Secondary outcomes were the effect by age group (16-29, 30-49, and ≥50 years) and by UK constituent country. The revenue generated from the tax and the income specific changes in weekly expenditure on drinks were also estimated. Results A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks was estimated to reduce the number of obese adults in the UK by 1.3% (95% credible interval 0.8% to 1.7%) or 180 000 (110 000 to 247 000) people and the number who are overweight by 0.9% (0.6% to 1.1%) or 285 000 (201 000 to 364 000) people. The predicted reductions in prevalence of obesity for income thirds 1 (lowest income), 2, and 3 (highest income) were 1.3% (0.3% to 2.0%), 0.9% (0.1% to 1.6%), and 2.1% (1.3% to 2.9%). The effect on obesity declined with age. Predicted annual revenue was £276m (£272m to £279m), with estimated increases in total expenditure on drinks for income thirds 1, 2, and 3 of 2.1% (1.4% to 3.0%), 1.7% (1.2% to 2.2%), and 0.8% (0.4% to 1.2%). Conclusions A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks would lead to a reduction in the prevalence of obesity in the UK of 1.3% (around 180 000 people). The greatest effects may occur in young people, with no significant differences between income groups. Both effects warrant further exploration. Taxation of sugar sweetened drinks is a promising population measure to target population obesity, particularly among younger adults.

[1]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Taxes on Food and Beverage Demand in a Large Demand System , 2014, American journal of agricultural economics.

[2]  M. Mazzocchi,et al.  The effect of rising food prices on food consumption: systematic review with meta-regression , 2013, BMJ.

[3]  J. Wojcicki.  Healthy hospital food initiatives in the United States: time to ban sugar sweetened beverages to reduce childhood obesity , 2013, Acta paediatrica.

[4]  M. D. de Boer,et al.  Price discounts significantly enhance fruit and vegetable purchases when combined with nutrition education: a randomized controlled supermarket trial. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[5]  Ronan A Lyons,et al.  UK health performance: findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2013, BDJ.

[6]  A. Brennan,et al.  Adjusting for unrecorded consumption in survey and per capita sales data: quantification of impact on gender- and age-specific alcohol-attributable fractions for oral and pharyngeal cancers in Great Britain. , 2013, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[7]  A. Spencer,et al.  Water fluoridation and the association of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and dental caries in Australian children. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[8]  I. Fitzpatrick.  A Children’s Future Fund: how food duties could provide the money to protect children’s health and the world they grow up in , 2013 .

[9]  T. Blakely,et al.  Food Pricing Strategies, Population Diets, and Non-Communicable Disease: A Systematic Review of Simulation Studies , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[10]  S. Osganian,et al.  A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Seidell,et al.  A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  O. Capps,et al.  Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the U.S. obesity problem. , 2012, Health economics.

[13]  S. Allender,et al.  What is the optimal level of population alcohol consumption for chronic disease prevention in England? Modelling the impact of changes in average consumption levels , 2012, BMJ Open.

[14]  M. Rayner,et al.  Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  S. Allender,et al.  Modelling the health impact of environmentally sustainable dietary scenarios in the UK , 2012, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[16]  Jennifer L. Pomeranz.  Advanced policy options to regulate sugar-sweetened beverages to support public health , 2012, Journal of public health policy.

[17]  B. Popkin,et al.  Patterns and trends of beverage consumption among children and adults in Great Britain, 1986–2009 , 2011, British Journal of Nutrition.

[18]  Travis A. Smith,et al.  Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. , 2011, Economics and human biology.

[19]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Differences in coronary heart disease, stroke and cancer mortality rates between England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: the role of diet and nutrition , 2011, BMJ Open.

[20]  K. Brownell,et al.  Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue. , 2011, Preventive medicine.

[21]  B. Swinburn,et al.  Increased energy intake entirely accounts for increase in body weight in women but not in men in the UK between 1986 and 2000. , 2011, The British journal of nutrition.

[22]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  I. Perry,et al.  Temporal trends in misclassification patterns of measured and self-report based body mass index categories - findings from three population surveys in Ireland , 2010, BMC public health.

[24]  W. Willett,et al.  Point-of-purchase price and education intervention to reduce consumption of sugary soft drinks. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[25]  Frank B. Hu,et al.  Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: Epidemiologic evidence , 2010, Physiology & Behavior.

[26]  F. Hu,et al.  Contemporary Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk , 2010 .

[27]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Food price and diet and health outcomes: 20 years of the CARDIA Study. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[28]  K. Brownell,et al.  The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[29]  W. Willett,et al.  The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  K. Hall,et al.  Modeling weight-loss maintenance to help prevent body weight regain. , 2008, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[31]  K. Brownell,et al.  Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[32]  F. Hu,et al.  Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[33]  I. Kawachi,et al.  Food taxation and pricing strategies to "thin out" the obesity epidemic. , 2006, American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

[34]  M. Walker,et al.  The Uneasy Case Against Discriminatory Excise Taxation: Soft Drink Taxes in Ireland , 2003 .

[35]  L Garby,et al.  Prediction of body weight changes caused by changes in energy balance , 2002, European journal of clinical investigation.

[36]  David L. Edgerton.  Weak Separability and the Estimation of Elasticities in Multistage Demand Systems , 1997 .

[37]  C. N. Morris,et al.  The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation , 1987 .

[38]  G K Gilbert,et al.  An open letter. , 1886, Science.

[39]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered. , 2013, Journal of health economics.

[40]  C. Heppner.  DRAFT Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame ( E 951 ) as a food additive , 2013 .

[41]  S. Capewell.  Measuring Up: the medical profession's prescription for the nation's obesity crisis. , 2013 .

[42]  M. Roizen.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes: A meta-analysis , 2012 .

[43]  Costas Meghir,et al.  BIVARIATE ALTERNATIVES TO THE TOBIT MODEL , 1987 .

[44]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  An Almost Ideal Demand System , 1980 .