Engaging Primary Care Patients to Use a Patient-Centered Personal Health Record

PURPOSE Health care leaders encourage clinicians to offer portals that enable patients to access personal health records, but implementation has been a challenge. Although large integrated health systems have promoted use through costly advertising campaigns, other implementation methods are needed for small to medium-sized practices where most patients receive their care. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods assessment of a proactive implementation strategy for a patient portal (an interactive preventive health record [IPHR]) offered by 8 primary care practices. The practices implemented a series of learning collaboratives with practice champions and redesigned workflow to integrate portal use into care. Practice implementation strategies, portal use, and factors influencing use were assessed prospectively. RESULTS A proactive and customized implementation strategy designed by practices resulted in 25.6% of patients using the IPHR, with the rate increasing 1.0% per month over 31 months. Fully 23.5% of IPHR users signed up within 1 day of their office visit. Older patients and patients with comorbidities were more likely to use the IPHR, but blacks and Hispanics were less likely. Older age diminished as a factor after adjusting for comorbidities. Implementation by practice varied considerably (from 22.1% to 27.9%, P <.001) based on clinician characteristics and workflow innovations adopted by practices to enhance uptake. CONCLUSIONS By directly engaging patients to use a portal and supporting practices to integrate use into care, primary care practices can match or potentially surpass the usage rates achieved by large health systems.

[1]  A. Schuchat DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES , 2015 .

[2]  Cynna Selvy Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) , 2015 .

[3]  Catherine L. Anderson,et al.  If We Offer it, Will They Accept? Factors Affecting Patient Use Intentions of Personal Health Records and Secure Messaging , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Ghalib A. Bello,et al.  Interactive Preventive Health Record to Enhance Delivery of Recommended Care: A Randomized Trial , 2012, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[5]  Shannon M. Canfield,et al.  Consistency of Patient Preferences About a Secure Internet-Based Patient Communications Portal , 2012, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[6]  Alexander H. Krist,et al.  Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[7]  Charles C. Hinnant,et al.  Exploring digital divides: An examination of eHealth technology use in health information seeking, communication and personal health information management in the USA , 2011, Health Informatics J..

[8]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Personal health records: a scoping review , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  T. Marshall,et al.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010: an update. , 2011, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  S. Woolf,et al.  A vision for patient-centered health information systems. , 2011, JAMA.

[11]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Digital divide: Use of electronic personal health record by different population groups , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[12]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[13]  Bradford W Hesse,et al.  Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[14]  Katie Coleman,et al.  Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria. , 2010, Health affairs.

[15]  Paul C Tang,et al.  Your doctor's office or the Internet? Two paths to personal health records. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  David Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[17]  J. Allison,et al.  Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[18]  Valerie M. Sue,et al.  If you build it, will they come? The Kaiser Permanente model of online health care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[19]  L. Solberg Improving Medical Practice: A Conceptual Framework , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[20]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Practice-based Assessment of Tobacco Usage in Southwestern Primary Care Patients: A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) Study , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[21]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines , 2006, Current opinion in cardiology.

[22]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[24]  David V. Power,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes: Response to position statement of the American Diabetes Association , 2006 .

[25]  D. Longo,et al.  Understanding health information, communication, and information seeking of patients and consumers: a comprehensive and integrated model , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[26]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[28]  R. Sorelle US Department of Health and Human Services gives states wider latitude in choosing services to be covered by Medicaid. , 2001, Circulation.

[29]  C. Koeck Time for organisational development in healthcare organisations , 1998 .

[30]  L. Solberg,et al.  Quality improvement in primary care clinics. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[31]  M. Lorentzon Doing Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[34]  J. Cleeman,et al.  The National Cholesterol Education Program. , 1989, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[35]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[36]  เถลิงศก โสมทิพย์ THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization , 2012 .

[37]  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule. , 2012, Federal register.

[38]  William B. Lober,et al.  Barriers to the use of a Personal Health Record by an Elderly Population , 2006, AMIA.

[39]  D. Power Standards of medical care in diabetes. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[40]  H. Chesson,et al.  ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES , 2006 .

[41]  R. Croyle,et al.  Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice (Second edition). , 2005 .

[42]  S. Grundy,et al.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health Behavior and Health Education , 1990 .