Response to “Quantifying the health impacts of ambient air pollutants: methodological errors must be avoided”
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Cohen | H. R. Anderson | B. Brunekreef | F. Forastiere | K. Katsouyanni | N. Künzli | D. Krewski | X. Querol | B. Ostro | F. Hurley | M. Krzyzanowski | R. Atkinson | M. Heroux | H. Walton | I. Mills
[1] J. Costa. A brave new world , 2018, Virchows Archiv.
[2] Bert Brunekreef,et al. Quantifying the health impacts of ambient air pollutants: recommendations of a WHO/Europe project , 2015, International Journal of Public Health.
[3] P. Morfeld,et al. Attributing the burden of cancer at work: three areas of concern when examining the example of shift-work , 2011, Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I.
[4] B. Brunekreef,et al. The brave new world of lives sacrificed and saved, deaths attributed and avoided. , 2007, Epidemiology.
[5] J F Hurley,et al. Life table methods for quantitative impact assessments in chronic mortality , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[6] S Greenland,et al. Relation of probability of causation to relative risk and doubling dose: a methodologic error that has become a social problem. , 1999, American journal of public health.
[7] B. Brunekreef. Air pollution and life expectancy: is there a relation? , 1997, Occupational and environmental medicine.
[8] Oehha Dinp Nsrl. Comments on the Diisononyl Phthalate ( DINP ) No Significant Risk Level ( NSRL ) Derived by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ( OEHHA , 2015 .