Evidence for Cognitive Processes Involved in the Control of Steady State of Walking in Healthy Subjects and after Cerebral Damage

Objective. The involvement of cognitive processes in the control of walking at steady state was studied in 10 healthy subjects and 18 subjects after unilateral vascular brain damage. A dual task paradigm was used to compare the performance level of a probe reaction time (RT) in sitting (simple task) and during standing or walking on a treadmill (dual task conditions). In this latter condition, RTs were classified and analyzed in relation to the different phases of the gait cycle. Results. The results show a marked increase in RT while walking compared to sitting and standing only in stroke subjects. Specific changes in RTs related to the gait cycle phases were observed in both healthy subjects and those after brain damage. It is concluded that walking at steady state is attentionally demanding. The phase-dependent modulations of the RTs suggest that cognitive processes may play a role in the control of the step cycle. The increase of attentional demand during walking in subjects who had suffered a stroke varies, depending on severity of impairments of walking but also on a reduced general attentional capacity. The dual task paradigm provides a sensitive tool in the assessment of walking ability in stroke subjects.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[2]  B G Bardy,et al.  Visual Cues and Attention Demand in Locomotor Positioning , 1991, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. , 2002, Human movement science.

[4]  K. Kurosawa.  Effects of Various Walking Speeds on Probe Reaction Time during Treadmill Walking 1 , 1994 .

[5]  L. Nyberg,et al.  “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people , 1997, The Lancet.

[6]  J. Kaye,et al.  Talking while walking , 1997, Neurology.

[7]  P. Goldie,et al.  Gait after stroke: initial deficit and changes in temporal patterns for each gait phase. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[9]  M. Morris,et al.  Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[10]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Attentional requirements of walking in spinal cord injured patients compared to normal subjects , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[11]  W Poewe,et al.  Influence of Concurrent Tasks on Gait: A Dual-Task Approach , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  M. Bonnard,et al.  Cognitive tuning of corticospinal excitability during human gait: adaptation to the phase. , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  The attentional demands of preferred and non-preferred gait patterns. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[14]  R. Tallis,et al.  Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. , 2001, Age and ageing.

[15]  M. Gardner,et al.  Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  M. Morris,et al.  Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  C. Bard,et al.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task paradigms? , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  L. Brown,et al.  Attentional demands for static postural control after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  P Haggard,et al.  Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Motor Learning and Performance , 1991 .

[23]  T. Platz,et al.  Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  C. Marsden,et al.  Dual task performance and processing resources in normal subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Inge Zijdewind,et al.  Motor fatigue and cognitive task performance in humans , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  B. Abernethy.  Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some applications and methodological constraints , 1988 .

[27]  N Lavie,et al.  Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[28]  M. MacKay-Lyons.  Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[29]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Cerebellar damage impairs automaticity of a recently practiced movement. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Laurent,et al.  Effects of attention on phase transitions between bimanual coordination patterns: a behavioral and cost analysis in humans , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.