Nonlinear distortion of gratings at the foveal resolution limit

Aliasing by the foveal cone mosaic causes high frequency interference fringes to look like bright and dark zebra stripes (primary zebra stripes) [Williams, Vision Research, 25, 195 (1985); Vision Research, 28, 433 (1988)]. Some observers report another type of zebra stripes defined by variations in chromaticity as well as brightness, which we call secondary zebra stripes. The conditions required to see the secondary zebra stripes are almost identical to those required to see the primary zebra stripes, except that they are seen at approximately half the spatial frequency. We consider the hypothesis that the secondary zebra stripes arise from aliasing by a particular packing arrangement of the M and L cone submosaics, but present evidence favoring an alternative hypothesis based on a known local nonlinearity in the visual system.

[1]  J. J. Vos,et al.  On the derivation of the foveal receptor primaries. , 1971, Vision research.

[2]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Williams,et al.  Consequences of spatial sampling by a human photoreceptor mosaic. , 1983, Science.

[4]  David Williams.  Aliasing in human foveal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[5]  David H. Brainard,et al.  The Cost of Trichromacy for Spatial Vision , 1991 .

[6]  David R. Williams,et al.  Consequences of spatial sampling for human motion perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  N J Coletta,et al.  Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  David Brewster.  XXXVII. On the undulations excited in the retina by the action of luminous points and lines , 1832 .

[10]  George M. Byram,et al.  The Physical and Photochemical Basis of Visual Resolving PowerPart II. Visual Acuity and the Photochemistry of the Retina , 1944 .

[11]  G. M. Byram.  THE PHYSICAL AND PHOTOCHEMICAL BASIS OF VISUAL RESOLVING POWER , 1944 .

[12]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Foveal cone thresholds , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  David R. Williams,et al.  Punctate sensitivity of the blue-sensitive mechanism , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis , 1989, Vision Research.

[15]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  David Williams.  Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye , 1988, Vision Research.

[17]  J M Enoch,et al.  Optical modulation by the isolated retina and retinal receptors. , 1972, Vision research.

[18]  David R. Williams,et al.  Seeing through the photoreceptor mosaic , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  John Krauskopf,et al.  Color appearance of small stimuli and the spatial distribution of color receptors , 1964 .

[20]  M Alpern,et al.  Cone pigments in human deutan colour vision defects. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Evidence for non-linear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. , 1973, Vision research.

[22]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[23]  P L Walraven,et al.  A closer look at the tritanopic convergence point. , 1974, Vision research.

[24]  John Krauskopf,et al.  23 – On Identifying Detectors , 1978 .