A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and IT: Combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology

We propose a new paradigm for next generation enterprise information systems for the continuous alignment of business and IT for the agile enterprise.The metamodelling approach supports both human-interpretable enterprise architecture models and machine-interpretable enterprise ontologies.Semantic lifting transforms metamodels for the enterprise architectures into machine-interpretable enterprise ontologies.Semantic metamodels express the semantics of all modelling concepts by an ontology. The ontology is extended by a metamodel, which defines the notation and syntax of the graphical modelling language.Examples of next generation enterprise information systems are described, which embed modelling tools and algorithms for model analysis, identification of adaptation needs, and risk assessment. The paper deals with Next Generation Enterprise Information Systems in the context of Enterprise Engineering. The continuous alignment of business and IT in a rapidly changing environment is a grand challenge for today's enterprises. The ability to react timeously to continuous and unexpected change is called agility and is an essential quality of the modern enterprise. Being agile has consequences for the engineering of enterprises and enterprise information systems. In this paper a new paradigm for next generation enterprise information systems is proposed, which shifts the development approach of model-driven engineering to continuous alignment of business and IT for the agile enterprise. It is based on a metamodelling approach, which supports both human-interpretable graphical enterprise architecture and machine-interpretable enterprise ontologies. Furthermore, next generation enterprise information systems are described, which embed modelling tools and algorithms for model analysis.

[1]  Knut Hinkelmann,et al.  An Ontology Based Modelling Tool for Knowledge Intensive E-Government Services , 2007 .

[2]  Rick Dove,et al.  Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Metamodelling Platforms , 2002, EC-Web.

[4]  Dean Allemang,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist - Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Second Edition , 2011 .

[5]  Bignolas Mira da Silva,et al.  Enterprise Architecture , 2007 .

[6]  Rick Dove Agile Enterprise Cornerstones: Knowledge, Values, and Response Ability , 2005, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion.

[7]  Knut Hinkelmann,et al.  Connecting enterprise architecture and information objects using an enterprise ontology , 2013, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Enterprise Systems: ES 2013.

[8]  Mark von Rosing,et al.  Business Process Model and Notation - BPMN , 2015, The Complete Business Process Handbook, Vol. I.

[9]  J. Den Haan,et al.  An Enterprise Ontology based approach to Model-Driven Engineering , 2009 .

[10]  Keith E. Williamson,et al.  Ontology reuse and application , 1998 .

[11]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  An organisation ontology for enterprise modelling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour , 1995, Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95).

[12]  Mihály Héder,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist, Second dition: Effective modeling in RDFS and OWL by Allemang Dean and Hendler James, Morgan Kaufmann, 384 pp., $55, ISBN 0-123-85965-4 , 2013, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[13]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[14]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  An organisation ontology for enterprise modeling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour , 1996 .

[15]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[16]  Wei Tang,et al.  Meta Object Facility , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[17]  Emanuela Merelli,et al.  The Role of Content and Context in Enterprise Repositories , 2010, BPM 2010.

[18]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[19]  Susanne Strahringer,et al.  Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs: eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysemethoden , 1996 .

[20]  Peter Höfferer,et al.  Achieving Business Process Model Interoperability Using Metamodels and Ontologies , 2007, ECIS.

[21]  Ronald E. Giachetti,et al.  Design of Enterprise Systems: Theory, Architecture, and Methods , 2010 .

[22]  Robert Woitsch,et al.  Knowledge Engineering in Business Process Management , 2015, Handbook on Business Process Management.

[23]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , 2004 .

[24]  Markus Völter,et al.  Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management , 2006 .

[25]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Enterprise Model Integration , 2003, EC-Web.

[26]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Enterprise ontology - theory and methodology , 2006 .

[27]  Barbara Thoenssen,et al.  Automatic, Format-independent Generation of Metadata for Documents Based on Semantically Enriched Context Information , 2013 .

[28]  Jeongsoo Lee,et al.  An ontology-based Enterprise Architecture , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[30]  Barbara Thönssen,et al.  Semantically Enriched Obligation Management - An Approach for Improving the Handling of Obligations Represented in Contracts , 2012, KMIS.

[31]  Knut Hinkelmann,et al.  Explicitly modelling relationships of risks on business architecture , 2014, eChallenges e-2014 Conference Proceedings.

[32]  Gerti Kappel,et al.  Lifting metamodels to ontologies: a step to the semantic integration of modeling languages , 2006, MoDELS'06.

[33]  T. Reiter,et al.  Towards a semantic infrastructure supporting model-based tool integration , 2006, GaMMa '06.

[34]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[35]  Simon Nikles,et al.  Separating Conceptual and Visual Aspects in Meta-Modelling , 2016 .

[36]  Hervé Panetto,et al.  Semantic annotation for knowledge explicitation in a product lifecycle management context: A survey , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[37]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Toward a Technology for Organizational Memories , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[38]  Fred A. Cummins,et al.  Building the Agile Enterprise: With SOA, BPM and MBM , 2008 .

[39]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  John Zachman’s Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework , 2010 .

[40]  Knut Hinkelmann,et al.  Towards a Procedure for Assessing Supply Chain Risks Using Semantic Technologies , 2012, IC3K.

[41]  Robert Woitsch,et al.  Business and IT alignment: the IT-Socket , 2009, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[42]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Ein Geschäftsprozessmanagement-Werkzeug der nächsten Generation — ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendungen , 2000, Wirtschaftsinf..

[43]  Michael Frei Event Data Sources for Enterprise Architecture Documentation , 2015 .

[44]  Robert Woitsch,et al.  Conceptual Modeling of the Organisational Aspects for Distributed Applications: The Semantic Lifting Approach , 2013, 2013 IEEE 37th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops.

[45]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Introduction to Business Process Management Systems Concepts , 1996 .

[46]  Alex Pasquini,et al.  Supporting Business and IT Alignment by Modeling Business and IT Strategy and Its Relations to Enterprise Architecture , 2014, 2014 Enterprise Systems Conference.

[47]  Dirk Matthes,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Kompendium , 2011 .

[48]  Franz Baader,et al.  What’s new in Description Logics , 2011, Informatik-Spektrum.

[49]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  Metamodels in action: An overview , 2006, ICSOFT.

[50]  Maria-Eugenia Iacob,et al.  ArchiMate 2.0 Specification , 2012 .