Location of the Internal Mammary Vessels for Microvascular Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The “1–2–3 Rule”

Background: Postmastectomy breast reconstruction provides psychosocial benefits in self-esteem, sexuality, and quality of life. Autologous procedures yield the highest overall patient satisfaction compared with implant-based breast reconstruction as the gold standard. The internal mammary vessels are the preferred recipient vessels for free flap breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to provide surgeons with a reliable method for locating the vessels intraoperatively. Methods: The internal mammary vessels were dissected bilaterally on 30 cadaveric specimens. Distances from the lateral sternal borders and the costochondral junctions to the internal mammary vessels at the second, third, and fourth costal levels were recorded. Descriptive bifurcation patterns were recorded. Initial dissection practicums were performed using the proposed safer dissection zone according to quantitative data. Results: Sixty internal mammary arteries and 120 internal mammary veins were studied at three costal levels, resulting in 180 sets of measurements. Distances from the lateral sternal border to the medial internal mammary vein were 6.12, 9.04, and 10.45 mm at costal levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Mean distances between costochondral junctions and internal mammary arteries were 12.80, 24.78, and 33.28 mm at costal levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Most internal mammary vein bifurcated at the third costal level, and the left side bifurcated higher than the right. Dissection practicums revealed that the proposed dissection zone was consistently reliable in locating the vessels. Conclusions: This study provides mean measurements from common bony landmarks to the internal mammary vessels, equipping surgeons with a reliable zone of dissection for recipient vessel exposure. This may decrease morbidity and improve outcomes in autologous breast reconstructions.

[1]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  National and Regional Differences in 32,248 Postmastectomy Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the Updated National Inpatient Survey , 2017, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  A. Klassen,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  S. Macadam,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine: Autologous Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  G. D. de Bock,et al.  Which Breast Is the Best? Successful Autologous or Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. , 2014, JAMA surgery.

[6]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Anita R. Kulkarni,et al.  Use of Autologous and Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction by U.S. Plastic Surgeons , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Part 2. The Influence of Changing Mastectomy Patterns on Reconstructive Rate and Method , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  E. Wang,et al.  Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[10]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  M. Hamdi,et al.  Advances in autologous breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator flaps. , 2012, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[12]  M. Chu,et al.  Feasibility of Internal Mammary Vessel Use in Breast Reconstruction versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: An Anatomic, Cadaveric Evaluation , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  R. Timman,et al.  Surgical Results, Aesthetic Outcome, and Patient Satisfaction after Microsurgical Autologous Breast Reconstruction following Failed Implant Reconstruction , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, Latissimus Flap, and Implant Techniques , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  An Anatomic Study of the Internal Mammary Veins: Clinical Implications for Free‐Tissue‐Transfer Breast Reconstruction , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.