Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE Assessment of the effectiveness of constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy and quantitative evaluation of the effects of CI therapy. DESIGN Intervention study; case series; pretreatment to posttreatment measures and follow-up 3 months after intervention. SETTING An outpatient department. PATIENTS Five chronic stroke patients with moderate motor deficit; convenience sample. INTERVENTIONS CI therapy consisting of restraint of the unaffected upper extremity in a sling for 14 days combined with 6 hours of training per weekday of the affected upper extremity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Actual Amount of Use Test (AAUT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) RESULTS: There was a substantial improvement in the performance times of the laboratory tests (AMAT, WMFT, p < or = .039) and in the quality of movement (AMAT, WMFT, p < or = .049; MAL, p = .049), particularly in the use of the extremity in "real world" environments (AAUT, p = .020), supported by results of quantitative evaluation. The effect sizes were large and comparable to those found in previous studies of CI therapy. CONCLUSIONS CI therapy is an efficacious treatment for chronic stroke patients, especially in terms of real world outcome.

[1]  J. Stewart,et al.  Stroke recovery: he can but does he? , 1979, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[2]  Imaging in neurologic rehabilitation , 1996 .

[3]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Long‐term Survival After First‐Ever Stroke: The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project , 1993, Stroke.

[4]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Recovery of Functional Status After Stroke: A Postrehabilitation Follow‐up Study , 1993, Stroke.

[5]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. , 1998 .

[7]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[8]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  P. Duncan Synthesis of Intervention Trials To Improve Motor Recovery following Stroke. , 1997, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect , 1982 .

[13]  L. Ince Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine : clinical applications , 1980 .

[14]  H. Flor,et al.  The Arm Motor Ability Test: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of the Forced-Use Paradigm , 1995 .

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. , 1992, BMJ.

[17]  C. Wolfe,et al.  A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. , 1997, Stroke.