Multi criteria analysis for bioenergy systems assessments

Sustainable bioenergy systems are, by definition, embedded in social, economic, and environmental contexts and depend on support of many stakeholders with different perspectives. The resulting complexity constitutes a major barrier to the implementation of bioenergy projects. The goal of this paper is to evaluate the potential of Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) to facilitate the design and implementation of sustainable bioenergy projects. Four MCA tools (Super Decisions, DecideIT, Decision Lab, NAIADE) are reviewed for their suitability to assess sustainability of bioenergy systems with a special focus on multi-stakeholder inclusion. The MCA tools are applied using data from a multi-stakeholder bioenergy case study in Uganda. Although contributing to only a part of a comprehensive decision process, MCA can assist in overcoming implementation barriers by (i) structuring the problem, (ii) assisting in the identification of the least robust and/or most uncertain components in bioenergy systems and (iii) integrating stakeholders into the decision process. Applying the four MCA tools to a Ugandan case study resulted in a large variability in outcomes. However, social criteria were consistently identified by all tools as being decisive in making a bioelectricity project viable.

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade , 2006 .

[2]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management , 2005 .

[4]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  Using a Software Tool for Public Decision Analysis: The Case of Nacka Municipality , 2007, Decis. Anal..

[5]  Daniela Russi,et al.  Energy Policies for Rural Electrification: A Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach , 2005 .

[6]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[7]  T. Buchholz,et al.  A participatory systems approach to modeling social, economic, and ecological components of bioenergy , 2007 .

[8]  Mats Danielson,et al.  Generalized evaluation in decision analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Paul Upham,et al.  Local public opinion of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: questionnaire survey results. , 2007 .

[10]  D. Horst,et al.  National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant , 2004 .

[11]  René von Schomberg.  Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making , 1993 .

[12]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives in a Framework for Evaluating Imprecision , 2005, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[14]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study , 2000 .

[15]  E. Løken.  Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems , 2007 .

[16]  Patricia Jaramillo,et al.  Energy supply for sustainable rural livelihoods. A multi-criteria decision-support system , 2007 .

[17]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Scaling up biomas gasifier use: applications, barriers and interventions , 2004 .

[18]  S. Dasappa,et al.  Sustainable biomass power for rural India: case study of biomass gasifier for village electrification. , 2004 .

[19]  Justin Mog,et al.  Struggling with Sustainability--A Comparative Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Development Programs , 2004 .

[20]  G. A. Mendoza,et al.  Prioritizing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: A Case Study on Participatory Decision Making , 2001 .

[21]  L. Reijnders.  Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use , 2006 .

[22]  Christopher Sutter,et al.  Sustainability check up for CDM projects , 2003 .

[23]  André Faaij,et al.  Governance of the emerging bio-energy markets , 2007 .

[24]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Daniel L. Schmoldt,et al.  Past Developments and Future Directions for the AHP in Natural Resources , 2001 .

[26]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[27]  Julia Blasch,et al.  Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? , 2010 .

[28]  Mark Reed,et al.  An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities , 2006 .

[29]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Integrated assessment and energy analysis : Quality assurance in multi-criteria analysis of sustainability , 2006 .

[30]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[31]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Scaling up biomass gasifier use: an application-specific approach , 2006 .

[32]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  An Integrated Multi-Criteria System to Assess Sustainable Energy Options: An Application of the Promethee Method , 2005 .

[33]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[34]  Felipe Bravo,et al.  Managing forest ecosystems , 2008 .

[35]  Kes McCormick,et al.  Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: Economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity, and supply chain co-ordination , 2007 .

[36]  D. Schmoldt,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making , 2001, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[37]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The emergence of post-normal science , 1993 .

[38]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  The DecideIT Decision Tool , 2003, ISIPTA.

[39]  R. Clift,et al.  Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems , 2007 .

[40]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[41]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Graphic tools for data representation in integrated analysis of farming systems , 2005 .

[42]  Love Ekenberg,et al.  Computing upper and lower bounds in interval decision trees , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[44]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Participatory modeling and analysis for sustainable forest management: Overview of soft system dynamics models and applications ☆ , 2006 .

[45]  André Faaij,et al.  The impact sustainability criteria on the costs and potentials of bioenergy production. An exploration of the impact of the implementation of sustainability criteria on the costs and potential of bioenergy production applied for case studies in Brazil and Ukraine , 2005 .

[46]  F. Lootsma.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement , 1999 .

[47]  Jon D. Erickson,et al.  Ecological Economics: A Workbook for Problem-Based Learning , 2005 .

[48]  Sajjad Zahir,et al.  Clusters in a group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  Bishnu Raj Upreti,et al.  Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales , 2004 .

[50]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework , 2007 .

[51]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[52]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 1972 .

[53]  Lawrence P. Abrahamson,et al.  Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops , 2004 .

[54]  Daniel L. Schmoldt,et al.  Efficient group decision making in workshop settings , 2001 .

[55]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management , 2003 .

[56]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support in forest management: the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained , 2005 .

[57]  H. Vacik,et al.  Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management , 2005 .