Near-field microwave imaging of biologically-based materials using a monopole transceiver system

A prototype monopole-transceiver microwave imaging system has been implemented, and initial single and multitarget imaging experiments involving biologically relevant property distributions have been conducted to evaluate its performance relative to a previously developed-waveguide system. A new, simplified, but more effective calibration procedure has also been devised and tested. Results show that the calibration procedure leads to improvements which are independent of the type of radiator used. Specifically, data-model match is found to increase by 0.4 dB in magnitude and 4/spl deg/ in phase for the monopoles and by 0.6 dB in magnitude and 7/spl deg/ in phase for the waveguides (on average) on a per measurement basis when the new calibration procedure is employed. Enhancements are also found in the reconstructed images obtained with the monopole system relative to waveguides. Improvements are observed in: 1) the recovered object shape; 2) the uniformity of the background; 3) edge detection; and 4) target property value recovery. Analyses of reconstructed images also suggest that there is a systematic decrease of approximately 10% in the reconstruction errors for the monopole system over its waveguide counterpart in single-target experiments and as much as a 20% decrease in multitarget cases. Results indicate that these enhancements stem from a better data-model match for the monopoles relative to waveguides which is consistent across the type of calibration procedure used. Comparisons of computations and measurements show an average improvement in data-model match of approximately 0.25 dB in magnitude and near 7/spl deg/ in phase in favor of the monopoles in this regard. Beyond this apparent imaging performance enhancement, the monopole system offers economy-of-space and low construction-cost considerations along with computational advantages (as described herein) which make it a compelling choice as a radiator/receiver element around which to construct a clinically viable near-field microwave imaging system.

[1]  C. Pichot,et al.  Microwave imaging-complex permittivity reconstruction with a Levenberg-Marquardt method , 1997 .

[2]  P.M. Meaney,et al.  Microwave imaging for tissue assessment: initial evaluation in multitarget tissue-equivalent phantoms , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  S.Y. Semenov,et al.  Microwave tomography: two-dimensional system for biological imaging , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  P.M. Meaney,et al.  An active microwave imaging system for reconstruction of 2-D electrical property distributions , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Two-dimensional hybrid element image reconstruction for TM illumination , 1995 .

[6]  M. Pastorino,et al.  On the use of regularization techniques in numerical inverse-scattering solutions for microwave imaging applications , 1995 .

[7]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Memory and operations count scaling of coupled finite-element and boundary-element systems of equations , 1992 .

[8]  C. Pichot,et al.  Inverse scattering: an iterative numerical method for electromagnetic imaging , 1991 .

[9]  Matteo Pastorino,et al.  A multiview microwave imaging system for two-dimensional penetrable objects , 1991 .

[10]  Ch. Pichot,et al.  Planar microwave imaging camera for biomedical applications: Critical and prospective analysis of reconstruction algorithms , 1991 .

[11]  L. Jofre,et al.  Medical imaging with a microwave tomographic scanner , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  J.-C. Bolomey,et al.  Recent European developments in active microwave imaging for industrial, scientific, and medical applications , 1989 .

[13]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Hybrid element method for unbounded electromagnetic problems in hyperthermia , 1986 .

[14]  L. E. Larsen,et al.  Medical Applications of Microwave Imaging , 1986 .

[15]  James C. Lin,et al.  Frequency optimization for microwave imaging of biological tissues , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  C. Durney,et al.  On the sensitivity and the resolution of microwave imaging using ART , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  C. Durney,et al.  On the electromagnetic imaging using linear reconstruction techniques , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  A dual mesh scheme for finite element based reconstruction algorithms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  M. Pastorino,et al.  Reconstruction of dielectric permittivity distributions in arbitrary 2-D inhomogeneous biological bodies by a multiview microwave numerical method , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.