Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments

Human orientation and spatial cognition partlydepends on our ability to remember sets ofvisual landmarks and imagine their relationshipto us from a different viewpoint. We normallymake large body rotations only about a singleaxis which is aligned with gravity. However,astronauts who try to recognize environmentsrotated in 3 dimensions report that theirterrestrial ability to imagine the relativeorientation of remembered landmarks does noteasily generalize. The ability of humansubjects to learn to mentally rotate a simplearray of six objects around them was studied in1-G laboratory experiments. Subjects weretested in a cubic chamber (n = 73) and aequivalent virtual environment (n = 24),analogous to the interior of a space stationnode module. A picture of an object waspresented at the center of each wall. Subjectshad to memorize the spatial relationships amongthe six objects and learn to predict thedirection to a specific object if their bodywere in a specified 3D orientation. Percentcorrect learning curves and response times weremeasured. Most subjects achieved high accuracyfrom a given viewpoint within 20 trials,regardless of roll orientation, and learned asecond view direction with equal or greaterease. Performance of the subject group thatused a head mounted display/head tracker wasqualitatively similar to that of the secondgroup tested in a physical node simulator. Body position with respect to gravity had asignificant but minor effect on performance ofeach group, suggesting that results may alsoapply to weightless situations. A correlationwas found between task performance measures andconventional paper-and-pencil tests of fieldindependence and 2&3 dimensional figurerotation ability.

[1]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  The coding and transformation of spatial information , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Chapter 3 Psychological Perspectives on Spatial Cognition Thomas , 1993 .

[4]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Idiothetic navigation in Gerbils and Humans , 1991 .

[5]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Deborah L. Harm,et al.  Self-attitude awareness training: An aid to effective performance in microgravity and virtual environments , 1993 .

[7]  Charles M. Oman,et al.  Space motion sickness: Symptoms, stimuli and predictability , 1983 .

[8]  A Berthoz,et al.  The contribution of otoliths and semicircular canals to the perception of two‐dimensional passive whole‐body motion in humans , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  T. Gärling,et al.  Behavior and environment : psychological and geographical approaches , 1993 .

[10]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  Examination of the Construct Validity of Alternative Measures of Field Dependence/Independence , 1991 .

[11]  B. Tversky,et al.  Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes , 1992 .

[12]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  J. Rieser,et al.  Sensitivity to Perspective Structure While Walking without Vision , 1986, Perception.

[15]  B. Tversky,et al.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[17]  H. A. Witkin A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[18]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[19]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.