Amygdalectomy and ventromedial prefrontal ablation produce similar deficits in food choice and in simple object discrimination learning for an unseen reward

SummaryCynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with either bilateral amygdalectomy or bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortical ablations showed abnormal choices between apple, lemon, olive, and meat. Not only did they choose meat or olive more often than normal animals, but also their choices were less consistent from trial to trial than the normal animals' choices were. The same animals were subsequently tested for their ability to learn 2-choice simultaneous visual discriminations between objects which they could suck. The positive object yielded fruit juice, which entered the mouth directly without being seen. Both groups of animals with lesions were severely impaired in this discrimination learning task. The reason why amygdalectomy has little effect on simple object discrimination learning in the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus, we suggest, is that the animal can there associate the visual discriminanda with the visual properties of the food reward, a mechanism which is not available when the reward is unseen. These results add to existing evidence of a close functional relationship between the amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and they support the proposal, derived from previous work, that the amygdala is important for associating visual stimuli with the incentive value of reinforcers.

[1]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Behavioral changes associated with ablation of the amygdaloid complex in monkeys. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  J. Orbach,et al.  Learning and retention in monkeys after amygdala-hippocampus resection. , 1960, Archives of neurology.

[3]  A. Cowey,et al.  The aetiology of food reward in monkeys , 1963 .

[4]  D. A. Poulos,et al.  Discrimination behavior after amygdalectomy in monkeys: learning set and discrimination reversals. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  H. Mahut Spatial and object reversal learning in monkeys with partial temporal lobe ablations. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus--reinforcement associations. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[7]  J. A. Horel,et al.  Partial Klu¨ver-Bucy syndrome produced by destroying temporal neocortex or amygdala , 1975, Brain Research.

[8]  T. J. Tobias,et al.  Afferents to prefrontal cortex from the thalamic mediodorsal nucleus in the rhesus monkey , 1975, Brain Research.

[9]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Evidence for the sequential participation of inferior temporal cortex and amygdala in the acquisition of stimulus-reward associations , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  R. Passingham,et al.  Syndrome produced by lesions of the amygdala in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 1981, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Direct and indirect pathways from the amygdala to the frontal lobe in rhesus monkeys , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  D. Amaral,et al.  Amygdalo‐cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis) , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  M Mishkin,et al.  Projections of the amygdala to the thalamus in the cynomolgus monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984 .

[16]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  The primate mediodorsal (MD) nucleus and its projection to the frontal lobe , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Visual recognition impairment follows ventromedial but not dorsolateral prefrontal lesions in monkeys , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  D. Amaral,et al.  The afferent input to the magnocellular division of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in the monkey, Macaca fascicularis , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Amygdalectomy and disconnection in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement by monkeys , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  P S Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Mediodorsal nucleus: Areal, laminar, and tangential distribution of afferents and efferents in the frontal lobe of rhesus monkeys , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Disconnection of the amygdala from visual association cortex impairs visual reward-association learning in monkeys , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  E. C. Gower,et al.  Efferent projections from limbic cortex of the temporal pole to the magnocellular medial dorsal nucleus in the rhesus monkey , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Visual-visual associative learning and reward-association learning in monkeys: the role of the amygdala , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Amygdalar interaction with the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in stimulus-reward associative learning in the monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  David Gaffan,et al.  Amygdala and the memory of reward. , 1992 .

[26]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Visual recognition in monkeys: effects of separate vs. combined transection of fornix and amygdalofugal pathways , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.