Sonographic joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: associations with clinical joint assessment during a state of remission.

OBJECTIVE Sonography, as compared with clinical assessment, is a sensitive tool for evaluating synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, differences between these assessment tools may depend on how joint activity (i.e., an active joint) is defined. The present study was undertaken to compare clinically active joints with sonographically active joints in patients with RA, applying different sonographic definitions of an active joint. METHODS Sonographic assessment of the finger and wrist joints (total of 11 joints) of each hand was performed in RA patients whose disease was in remission (Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8; n = 60). Gray-scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) ultrasound signals for synovitis were evaluated on a 4-point scale (grade 0 = none, grade 3 = severe). The sensitivity and specificity of swollen joint counts were investigated using, as reference, increasingly stringent sonographic definitions of an active joint. Sonographic findings were also assessed for correlations with other clinical variables, including the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI). Followup analyses were performed after 6-12 months. RESULTS GS ultrasound signals yielded positive findings for synovitis in 67.2% of the 1,320 joints assessed, and PD ultrasound signals indicated signs of synovitis in 20.4% of the joints assessed. Clinical identification of joint swelling was 100% specific for sonographic joint activity, independent of the stringency of the sonographic definition used; maximum sensitivity of the swollen joint counts was 25% for the most stringent definition (i.e., GS grade 3 and PD grade 3). Furthermore, patients with a higher-grade PD signal (grade 3) showed a higher HAQ DI score compared to patients with lower-grade PD signals (mean ± SD HAQ DI 0.45 ± 0.62 versus 0.20 ± 0.35). A higher grade of PD signal at baseline was found in joints that were assessed as clinically swollen at the consecutive followup visit. CONCLUSION Low-grade PD and GS ultrasound signals may not necessarily reflect the presence of active synovitis in RA joints. High-grade PD signals correlate well with the presence of clinical joint swelling and clinical disease activity, and a higher grade of PD signal is associated with higher degrees of functional impairment.

[1]  M. Dougados,et al.  Clinical and Ultrasound‐Based Composite Disease Activity Indices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Multicenter, Randomized Study , 2013, Arthritis care & research.

[2]  Y. Ishigatsubo,et al.  Ultrasonography is a potent tool for the prediction of progressive joint destruction during clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis , 2013, Modern rheumatology.

[3]  R. Caporali,et al.  In patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, the new ACR/EULAR definition of remission identifies patients with persistent absence of functional disability and suppression of ultrasonographic synovitis , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  M. Dougados,et al.  After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes? , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  M. Dougados,et al.  Metrologic properties of ultrasound versus clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized study. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  D. Felson Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  J. Smolen,et al.  Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis progresses in remission according to the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints and is driven by residual swollen joints. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  E. Naredo,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review Analysis of Ultrasound Joint Count and Scoring Systems to Assess Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis According to the OMERACT Filter , 2011, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[9]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Damage and Progression on Radiographs in Individual Joints: Data from Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials , 2011, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[10]  J. Smolen,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis near remission: clinical rather than laboratory inflammation is associated with radiographic progression , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  R. Ionescu,et al.  Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis - volar versus dorsal synovitis evaluation and scoring , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[12]  C. Dejaco,et al.  Similar performance of DAS-28, CDAI, and SDAI in rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without sonographic signs of active inflammation in routine clinical practice , 2011, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[13]  F. Salaffi,et al.  Differential diagnosis between rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: the value of ultrasound findings at metacarpophalangeal joints level , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  P. Emery,et al.  Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[15]  P. Taylor,et al.  Quantitative Power Doppler Ultrasonography Is a Sensitive Measure of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Synovial Vascularity in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Declines Significantly Following a 2-week Course of Oral Low-dose Corticosteroids , 2010, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[16]  A. Filer,et al.  Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  G. Ferraccioli,et al.  Clinical and ultrasonographic remission determines different chances of relapse in early and long standing rheumatoid arthritis , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  A. Silman,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis classifi cation criteria : an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative , 2010 .

[19]  M. Dougados,et al.  Reproducibility of Joint Swelling Assessment by Sonography in Patients with Long-lasting Rheumatoid Arthritis (SEA-Repro Study Part II) , 2010, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[20]  E. Martı́n-Mola,et al.  Superiority of SDAI over DAS-28 in assessment of remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients using power Doppler ultrasonography as a gold standard. , 2010, Rheumatology.

[21]  Maurizio Cutolo,et al.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  G. Burmester,et al.  Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  M. Dougados,et al.  Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems for synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  R. Caporali,et al.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. , 2009, Rheumatology.

[25]  P. Emery,et al.  Disease remission state in patients treated with the combination of tumor necrosis factor blockade and methotrexate or with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A clinical and imaging comparative study. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis joint progression in sustained remission is determined by disease activity levels preceding the period of radiographic assessment. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  C. Peterfy,et al.  An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  P. Emery,et al.  Delay in imaging versus clinical response: a rationale for prolonged treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor medication in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  J. Smolen,et al.  The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to monitor patients in standard clinical care. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[30]  Esperanza Naredo,et al.  Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[31]  C. Peterfy,et al.  Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[32]  S. Saarakkala,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipments , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[33]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.

[34]  J. Smolen,et al.  The definition and measurement of disease modification in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. , 2006, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[35]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[36]  J Uson,et al.  Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[37]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  H. Bliddal,et al.  Doppler ultrasound findings in healthy wrists and finger joints , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[39]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[40]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[41]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Validity and reliability of joint indices. A longitudinal study in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.

[42]  J. Fries,et al.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. , 1982, The Journal of rheumatology.

[43]  M. Tanguy,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasound, but not low-field magnetic resonance imaging, predicts relapse and radiographic disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low levels of disease activity. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[44]  V. Milic,et al.  Construct validity and reliability of ultrasound disease activity score in assessing joint inflammation in RA: comparison with DAS-28. , 2012, Rheumatology.

[45]  U. Tateishi,et al.  Simultaneous evaluation of long-lasting knee synovitis in patients undergoing arthroplasty by power Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRI in comparison with histopathology. , 2012, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[46]  E. Naredo,et al.  Inter-observer agreement of standard joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with grey scale ultrasonography--a preliminary study. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[47]  Maarten Boers,et al.  Progression of radiologic damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[48]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[49]  Clinical and Epidemiological Research , 2022 .