“Like Ships in the Night” and the Paradox of Distinctiveness for Sport Management: A Citation Network Analysis of Institutional Theory in Sport

A central issue within sport management is the extent to which the field should develop a distinctive theoretical knowledge base. This paper empirically investigates the connectedness within (intrafield) and between (interfield) management and sport management disciplines in one specific knowledge domain—institutional theory. We utilized a database of 188 sport-related institutional studies and conducted a citation network analysis of the aggregated reference lists from these articles. We argue that the fields of management and sport management act like “ships in the night.” That is, as the field of sport management has become more distinctive, the field is becoming less connected with general management literature and contemporary theoretical discussions. Potential implications for sport management scholarship and understanding the nature of the field are discussed, along with how it may be possible (if desired) to bridge the gap between sport and management research.

[1]  Jan-Michael Ross,et al.  Using Sports Data to Advance Management Research: A Review and a Guide for Future Studies , 2022, Journal of Management.

[2]  George B. Cunningham,et al.  The Distinctiveness of Sport Management Theory and Research , 2021, Kinesiology Review.

[3]  Calvin Nite,et al.  From isomorphism to institutional work: advancing institutional theory in sport management research , 2021, Sport Management Review.

[4]  B. Mills A Peculiarity That Positions Sport Management , 2021 .

[5]  K. Munir,et al.  From Patañjali to the “Gospel of Sweat”: Yoga’s Remarkable Transformation from a Sacred Movement into a Thriving Global Market , 2021, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[6]  G. Bloom,et al.  A citation network analysis of career mentoring across disciplines: A roadmap for mentoring research in sport , 2020 .

[7]  Hallgeir Gammelsæter Sport is not industry: bringing sport back to sport management , 2020 .

[8]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Sensemaking from the Body: An Enactive Ethnography of Rowing the Amazon , 2019 .

[9]  D. Andrew,et al.  Is There Anything Unique About Sport Management? An Introduction to the JGSM Special Issue on “The Uniqueness of the Sport Context” , 2019, Journal of Global Sport Management.

[10]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  An Integrative Perspective of Organizational Responses: Routines, Heuristics, and Improvisations in a Mount Everest Expedition , 2019, Organization Science.

[11]  Michael P. Sam,et al.  Building sport policy’s legitimacy in Norway and New Zealand , 2018 .

[12]  Mathew Dowling Exploring Sport Management as an Academic Profession: A Critical Review of Occupational Theory , 2018 .

[13]  Marvin Washington,et al.  Institutional Adaptation to Technological Innovation: Lessons From the NCAA’s Regulation of Football Television Broadcasts (1938–1984) , 2017 .

[14]  D. Madigan,et al.  Athlete burnout: review and recommendations. , 2017, Current opinion in psychology.

[15]  Letian Zhang A Fair Game? Racial Bias and Repeated Interaction between NBA Coaches and Players , 2017 .

[16]  Jimmy Smith,et al.  The Institutional Work of Own the Podium in Developing High-Performance Sport in Canada , 2016 .

[17]  Denis Hellebrandt,et al.  Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of , 2015 .

[18]  D. J. Hancock,et al.  Citation network analysis of research on sport officials: a lack of interconnectivity , 2015 .

[19]  R. Spaaij,et al.  Mixed Methods in Emerging Academic Subdisciplines , 2015 .

[20]  Wesley Helms,et al.  Eliciting Acceptance For “Illicit” Organizations: The Positive Implications of Stigma for MMA Organizations , 2014 .

[21]  Bogdan Ciomaga Sport management: a bibliometric study on central themes and trends , 2013 .

[22]  Mark de Rond,et al.  On the Plasticity of Institutions: Containing and Restoring Practice Breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club , 2013 .

[23]  George B. Cunningham Theory and theory development in sport management , 2013 .

[24]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  WIELDING THE WILLOW: PROCESSES OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN ENGLISH COUNTY CRICKET , 2013 .

[25]  Wade D. Gilbert,et al.  Mapping the World of Coaching Science: A Citation Network Analysis , 2012 .

[26]  David Shilbury,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of four sport management journals , 2011 .

[27]  Marvin Washington,et al.  Hostile takeover or joint venture: Connections between institutional theory and sport management research , 2011 .

[28]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  Do Theories of Organizations Progress? , 2010 .

[29]  J. Cȏté,et al.  An appraisal of athlete development models through citation network analysis , 2010 .

[30]  Bob Stewart,et al.  The special features of sport: a critical revisit , 2010 .

[31]  A. Booth,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[32]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Social network theory and analysis: a complementary lens for inquiry. , 2008 .

[33]  Daniel M. Ladik,et al.  The contribution continuum , 2008 .

[34]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[35]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Competitive Crowding and Risk Taking in a Tournament: Evidence from NASCAR Racing , 2007 .

[36]  Marvin Washington Field Approaches to Institutional Change: The Evolution of the National Collegiate Athletic Association 1906–1995 , 2004 .

[37]  John Amis,et al.  The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change , 2004 .

[38]  Danny O’Brien,et al.  An Analysis of Change in an Organizational Field: The Professionalization of English Rugby Union , 2003 .

[39]  W. J. Weese If We’re Not Serving Practitioners, Then We're Not Serving Sport Management , 1995 .

[40]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[41]  T. Slack,et al.  Institutional Pressures and Isomorphic Change: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[42]  T. Slack,et al.  Understanding Change in National Sport Organizations: An Integration of Theoretical Perspectives , 1992 .

[43]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[44]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[45]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  B. K. Forscher,et al.  Chaos in the Brickyard. , 1963, Science.

[47]  Hakyeon Lee Uncovering the multidisciplinary nature of technology management: journal citation network analysis , 2014, Scientometrics.

[48]  A. Doherty “It Takes a Village:” Interdisciplinary Research for Sport Management , 2012 .

[49]  L. Chalip Toward a Distinctive Sport Management Discipline , 2006 .

[50]  T. Slack,et al.  The emergence of a professional logic in English rugby union: the role of isomorphic and diffusion processes. , 2004 .

[51]  B. Pitts Sport Management at the Millennium: A Defining Moment , 2001 .

[52]  Aaron C. T. Smith,et al.  The Special Features of Sport , 1999 .

[53]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[54]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[55]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.